The Court is mindful that a further delay for about one year before the Supreme Court (see paragraph 2 above), which started functioning in December 2017 following the implementation of the

She also submits that many delays were caused by inadequate expert opinions and the necessity to procure supplementary opinions.

The Court held unanimously that:   ●     there had been a violation of Article 8 (right to respect for correspondence) of the European Convention on Human Rights on account of the delays

decisions requiring State to provide accommodation and material support to applicants for international protection: violation Article 34 Hinder the exercise of the right of application Unreasonable delays

Not only would the Court effectively become a ”court of fourth instance”, but the problem of delay at domestic level would be further exacerbated.

In April 2011, the applicant sought leave for the second time to bring judicial review proceedings to prevent the trial, on account of the overall delay.

of costs and expenses, namely a total sum of 65   000   000   Italian lire, and that interest should be payable on any unpaid sum, calculated on the basis of each full elapsed month of delay

La présidente du tribunal a désigné, en application de l'article L. 511-2 du code de justice administrative, Mme Isabelle Dely, première vice-présidente, comme juge des référés.

    The Government denied that there had been any excessive delay in hearing the appeals, and noted that the applicant had had procedures available to her to deal with any delays on the part

    Entry into force of the Act on the Protection of the Right to a Trial without undue Delay 25.

#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 2(g) – Article 3(2) and (3) – Right to compensation in the event of a long delay to a flight – Scope – Passengers

decision by a judgment of the Court – General reference to other documents – Pleas in law or complaints raised by a third party in another case – Evidence submitted in the reply – No justification for the delay

time requirement – issues raised by compensation proceedings not complex – no steps taken by registry of Supreme Court to deal with applicant’s appeal during a period of four years and two months – delay

  364/19) which he eventually withdrew – allegedly as a result of the delay in the proceedings – requesting his extradition to Russia.

In 2011 the applicant brought proceedings seeking damages for the delays in the compensation procedure but was unsuccessful.

appropriate steps to safeguard the lives of those within its jurisdiction (see L.C.B. v. the United Kingdom , 9   June 1998, § 36, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-III), was the State’s delay

Regulatory measures were also being introduced with a view to addressing the underlying problem of unreasonable delays.

authorities have provided no tangible information demonstrating that the Court’s findings have been duly taken into account,   STRONGLY URGES the authorities of Azerbaijan to take, without any further delay

The applicant company complains that the delay on the part of the carabinieri to issue an attestation confirming the use of its products for exempted purposes rendered the right to be refunded unenforceable