CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1006JUD003058204
6 octobre 2015
M.Sh. identified the second applicant as the leader of the crowd, giving them instructions to move towards the police, telling them to move “Forward!”
Page 37 sur 355
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0707JUD000541815
7 juillet 2022
The boat had sunk because a coastguard vessel had attempted to tow it back towards the Turkish coast at very high speed.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0912JUD005835814
12 septembre 2023
During the event the applicant was holding a balloon with the inscription “Jesus Christ loves men and women equally”, when one of the counter-demonstrators, Mr L., fired five times towards
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0504JUD002474694
4 mai 2001
He staggered across the road towards the four men followed by four police officers.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1022DEC002020716
22 octobre 2019
At the end of that session, the applicant had been verbally aggressive towards the mother when she had come to pick up the child and towards the security guard present at the premises, all in the presence
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0404DEC003005496
4 avril 2000
After shooting started but before the bomb went off, this car began to reverse towards the soldiers in position 5.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0227JUD003949611
27 février 2018
Desecration is an insulting attitude, brutal mockery, or a demonstration of contempt towards a burial place or the ashes of the deceased.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0322JUD001935509
22 mars 2022
Because Pte Ye.F. had testified against Pte K., attitude of his fellow servicemen towards him grew worse. 6 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0402JUD003081713
2 avril 2026
They had been defamatory towards the applicants and aimed at misleading the readers. The applicants relied on, inter alia , Article 9 of the Convention. 11.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1030JUD004093816
30 octobre 2018
The court pointed out that the same pattern could be observed as regards the applicant’s attitude towards the other three children. 2. The applicant’s first appeal 39 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0707JUD000800021
Both parents’ testimony was aimed at depicting the other parent as a person who was intolerant towards the child.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0304DEC003628397
4 mars 1998
Interestingly, the members develop towards a standard personality (standardisation of personality attributes of the sect members).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0303DEC004630709
3 mars 2015
The court credited the period of his pre-trial detention between 18 January 2001 and 18 January 2005 towards the term of his imprisonment. 12. The applicant appealed.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0822JUD000837403
22 août 2006
The applicant considered that it was blatant discrimination that almost double the number of women to men were in receipt of the State pension yet they had paid less towards the fund, became
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0117DEC002529194
17 janvier 1995
On 9 February 1992 an expert opinion of a psychiatrist, an education specialist and a psychologist found that the applicant suffered from reactive neurosis and that his approach towards the upbringing
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-182203
15 mars 2018
[the applicant community] in [Nagorno Karabakh], we find that the ministers (preachers) use a number of methods of psychological influence towards believers...
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0621JUD006577411
21 juin 2022
A.S. drove the car abruptly towards the road and drove away. The officers believed that it could have been P. who was attempting to escape.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0611JUD001127216
11 juin 2024
The applicant was often aggressive towards other detainees and the prison guards, insulting them and threatening them with violence and death.
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-451299-452082
21 novembre 2001
In Fogarty v. the United Kingdom the Court observed that there appeared to be a trend in international and comparative law towards limiting State immunity in respect of employment-related disputes
7ème chambre 1ère section
67f0243202fc178212f7e43f
1 avril 2025
TRIBUNAL JUDICIAIRE DE PARIS [1] [1] Copies exécutoires délivrées le : à Me TOLLARD-MOURNEIZON, Me FASSINA, Me DANILOWIEZ, Me DERAY, Me CASANOVA, Me NELSOM, Me RAFFIN, Me PELTIER et Me SMAIL ■ 7ème