However, if no health insurance contribution was paid, those beneficiaries did not benefit of any health insurance, as opposed to the “wounded fighters”, who were expressly considered by the law as being

RG n° 13/08249 APPELANTS Monsieur [B] [B] né le [Date naissance 1] 1980 à PARIS demeurant [Adresse 1] (ROYAUME UNI) Représenté par Me Florence GUERRE de la SELARL SELARL PELLERIN - DE MARIA

On 18 and 20   February 2006 a group of persons from Pesceana and the neighbouring villages did not allow the applicants, the bailiff or the police to enter the cemetery.

X... fait grief à l'arrêt attaqué d'avoir dit qu'il était redevable d'une indemnité d'occupation depuis le 1er février 1994 jusqu'à la date du partage ; Attendu qu'après avoir relevé que M.

The Court reiterates that where an applicant dies during the examination of a case his or her heirs may in principle pursue the application on his or her behalf (see Ječius v. Lithuania , no.

The Building Regulations Act did not provide any compensation to the land owner concerned in case a building prohibition was issued.

The applicants either disagreed with the declarations on various grounds and requested the Court to pursue the examination of their cases or did not provide any comments.

On 22 August 2001 the first applicant married the second applicant. In June 2005 their second daughter, M.N., was born.

They also complained under Article 13 of the Convention that they did not have an effective domestic remedy in this regard.

[I] et de Mme [O], mariés sans contrat de mariage, et ordonné la liquidation et le partage de leurs intérêts patrimoniaux. 2.

dispositions de l'article 9 du nouveau Code de procédure civile; et alors, d'autre part, qu'en relevant, d'un côté, que la société Rohde France avait produit aux débats une publicité de la société Marietta

lorsque celui-ci est dissous; que si la cour d'appel, par motifs adoptés, a déclaré que, lors de la procédure de divorce, l'emprunt était remboursé depuis plus de dix ans, elle a, ce faisant, dénaturé

GERMAN contre l’Espagne   La Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (troisième section), siégeant le 5 mai 2020 en un comité composé de   :   Helen Keller, présidente,   María Elósegui

The applicant did not appeal to the Administrative Jurisdiction Division of the Council of State (“the Administrative Jurisdiction Division”).

The applicant did not dispute the facts as presented by the Government.

    Principal facts   The applicants, João José Perdigão and Maria José Queiroga Perdigão, are Portuguese nationals who were born respectively in 1932 and 1933 and live in Lisbon.

margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sB81E279F { width:179.94pt; display:inline-block } FIFTH SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 46885/07 by Mariya

The forensic expert did not rule out a possibility that the injuries were inflicted on 15/03/2018, as indicated by the applicant.

Maruste , judges ,   Mr   F. Gölcüklü , ad hoc judge , and Mr M.