font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 22 April 2025   SECOND SECTION Application no. 4137/21 Ruzhica NIKOLOVSKA against North Macedonia lodged on 13 January 2021 communicated on 31 March

Following criminal investigation and proceedings, on 8 March 2024 the Rijeka Municipal Court acquitted K.K. for the criminal offence of grave bodily injury ( teška tjelesna ozljeda ) finding that the applicant

Totale numéro 2023/013400 du 20/06/2024 accordée par le bureau d’aide juridictionnelle de [Localité 7] Ayant pour conseil Me Sandra BONFILS FILAINE, avocat, #C2063 DÉFENDEUR Monsieur [T] [W] [Adresse

Ordonne qu'à la diligence de M. le procureur général près la Cour de Cassation, le présent arrêt sera transmis pour être transcrit sur les registres du tribunal de grande instance de Nanterre, en marge

} .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt }   Communicated on 30 March

However, that finding was erroneous.

  They submit that the Constitutional Court, in its decision of 3 March 1989, only objected to the findings of the disciplinary bodies in regard to the applicant's request to the President of the

The Court has examined and dismissed them, finding the said remedies ineffective (see, for example, Aleksandr   Makarov v. Russia , no.   15217/07, §§   76-91, 12   March 2009).

After a few months of the filing of the request of prosecution against the applicant, competent judicial authorities dismissed the proceedings for the offence of insulting an officer, finding that the

  In March 1991 the company was transformed into Rakona a.s. with 100% property participation of the State.

Hence, the court had been wrong in finding that it was his involvement with another woman which had caused the marital problems.

In March 2004 P.T. filed a VAT return on behalf of the beneficiary for the period between 1   November 2003 and 31   March   2004.

Quesada , Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 22 March 2007, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

  2257/12, §   81, 12   December 2017), the Court considers that the finding of a violation constitutes sufficient just satisfaction in the present case.

On 9 March 2002 a police investigator accused the applicant and another person of a drugs offence.

that there had been: a violation of Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment) of the European Convention on Human Rights concerning the conditions of the applicant’s detention from 23 March

2005, final on 24 June 2005 and of 15 December 2005 (revision and just satisfaction), final on 15 March 2006     The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the

They arrived in Belgium in March 2011 on a flight from Moscow.