Aside from Section 108 of the General Penal Code a reference may be made in this regard to Sections 88, 95, 121, 125, 210 and 229, and Sections 233.a to 237 of the same Code.

Thereafter, he made a number of applications for bail. One of these bail applications was heard by Mr Justice Treacy over two days (14 May 2009 and 25 June 2009) before being refused on 30 June 2009.

From 21   June 2000 to 3 May 2001 six hearings were scheduled and only one of them took place. On many occasions the hearings were postponed due to the absence of the defendants.

Hearings before that court were held on 8 May, 3 July, 14 and 23   October 2003.

The Government also submitted additional pleadings on 9th and 20th May, 1966.

He was in detention on remand from 26 to 27   May 1998. 8.

The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

        On 4 June 1991 Hackney Law Centre made available to the Secretary of State a report of a medical examination of the applicant which had taken place on 30 May 1991

  The applicant's representatives made submissions on 19 and 25 May and 7 July 1995.   13.

The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 1.

The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

in the framework of the attempt to secure a friendly settlement may be referred to or relied on in contentious proceedings.

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Wypukoł-Piętka v.

if it specifies the defendant against whom it is made, the ground on which it is made, and its amount. 2.

        The facts of the present case, as submitted by the applicant and which may be deduced from documents lodged with the application, may be summarised as follows : &#

Further the Government noted that since 26   May 2016 the applicant had been held in the cells measuring no less than 4.2-4.9 m² per inmate, having specified the space of each cell and how many detainees

She made no comment concerning the Government’s first assertion.

    The jury separated at the end of the day on 1 May and resumed their deliberations on 2 May.

On 17 May 2001 the Supreme Court refused the applicant leave to appeal. B.