CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1983:1123JUD000891980
23 novembre 1983
No one shall be required to perform forced or compulsory labour. 3.
Page 37 sur 322
SALON D'HONNEUR
69a43bc6cdc6046d4724a3ae
12 juin 2025
[Adresse 2] [Localité 2] Registre du Commerce et des Sociétés de Versailles n° 552 144 503 (Avocat postulant : Maître Hugo GERVAIS DE LAFOND (RACINE AVOCATS), avocat au barreau de Marseille) (Avocat plaidant
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0727JUD006753401
27 juillet 2004
The Court notes that Article 221 of the Labour Code provides that “disputes pertaining to labour relations shall be dealt with by: 1) the labour disputes commissions; 2) the district (city
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0909DEC003697697
9 septembre 1998
He maintained that the breath test was not sufficient to establish a breach of Section 135 para. 3(d) of the Labour Code.
1ère Chambre
DTA_2304312_20250114
14 janvier 2025
A, représentant la commune de Serviers-et-Labaume. Considérant ce qui suit : 1.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-248997
4 février 2026
28813/15) complain that they were subjected to forced labour.
ECLI:CEDH:001-150497
18 décembre 2014
By letters of 25 December 2009 and 1 February 2010 the Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs and the State Social Security Service respectively refused to grant the applicant’s request, stating that the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0521DEC002741195
21 mai 1997
On 15 June 1993, the applicant appealed to the Labour Court.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0113DEC001519889
13 janvier 1992
Pölten Labour Court (Arbeitsgericht) against his parents, claiming AS 1.203.703 with interest.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0929DEC002540904
29 septembre 2009
(Izmir Labour Court) 27.12.2005 22514/06 1.06.1977 (SSK) 5.10.1978 (Izmir Civil Court) 8.06.2005 (Izmir Labour Court) 15.11.2005 31463/07
ECLI:CEDH:001-152959
17 février 2015
In response, the applicants introduced labour proceedings before the Granollers Labour Court no. 1 on 22 July 2009, requesting the court to find their dismissal unlawful.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0309JUD007540201
9 mars 2006
On 3 March 1993 the Ljubljana Court of Associated Labour again rejected the applicant’s claims.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0917DEC005272499
17 septembre 2002
Labour Institute was discussed by the parties.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0405JUD002804113
5 avril 2016
a labour accident that she had suffered and with regard to which she was claiming damages and compensation. 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0914DEC002987807
14 septembre 2010
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1127DEC002975396
27 novembre 1996
The Labour Court, having regard to the case-law of the Federal Labour Court (Bundesarbeitsgericht), observed that employers had a statutory duty equitably to review operational pensions every three
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0629JUD000541706
29 juin 2010
On 26 February 1997 the Pest County Labour Court was appointed to hear the case. 13.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0510DEC007055301
10 mai 2005
On 31 March 1995 the applicant instituted proceedings before the Budapest Labour Court.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0923DEC001863008
23 septembre 2014
proceedings for dismissal Рев.бр. 555/09 25/07/2013 10/07/2013 850 29681/09 27/05/2009 Kristijan RADEVSKI 03/07/1971 Resen Dragan PETROVSKI Labour proceedings for dismissal Рев.бр
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1204DEC000573003
4 décembre 2008
No one shall be required to perform forced or compulsory labour. 3. For the purpose of this article the term ‘forced or compulsory labour’ shall not include: ...