CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1129DEC006875601
29 novembre 2005
Hence, the domestic court was not aware that the applicant’s case met the requirements Article 18 of the 2004 Act read together with Article 5 of that Act.
Page 37 sur 174
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1572432-1645973
31 janvier 2006
Although the issue raised in the present case concerned a doctrine upheld by the Catholic Church, and hence a religious matter, an analysis of the article in question showed that it did not contain attacks
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0927DEC003998319
27 septembre 2022
In any event, she emphasised that the friendly-settlement declarations had not been published on the SAC website, hence they had not been disclosed to the public. 7.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0314DEC005564419
14 mars 2023
Hence, the Court concludes that respect for human rights does not require the examination of these applications. 16.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0927DEC003999719
In any event, she emphasised that the friendly-settlement declarations themselves had not been published on the SAC website, hence they had not been disclosed to the public. 7.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-140634
5 décembre 2013
Hence, it follows that the old practice of the Supreme Court of Cassation is no longer applicable.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0217DEC005432322
17 février 2026
Hence, the applicant ought to have been aware of that requirement and should have complied with it at all stages of the proceedings (see the relevant case-law cited in paragraph 7 above).
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-13284
1 juin 2021
Hence, at least the initial stages of the investigation should not have been too difficult.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0418JUD005955208
18 avril 2013
Hence, he could have foreseen that he ran the risk of the penalty laid down in Article 215a of the Criminal Code. 2. The Court’s assessment 27.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0409JUD006582912
9 avril 2015
Such fines, when imposed, were coercive rather than compensatory in nature and the person concerned could not claim to be the recipient and hence the beneficiary.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0614JUD000061912
14 juin 2016
Hence, it could not be regarded as having been disproportionate to the aim pursued. 48.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0331JUD006235609
31 mars 2016
The land had belonged to the State and hence had not been ownerless at the material time, so the District Court should not have applied the acquisitive prescription rules to the case.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0309DEC005818200
9 mars 2006
Hence the new owners in those cases could not have reasonably expected to remain proprietors and their legitimate expectation of remaining proprietors ( Vertrauensschutz ) did not deserve protection. 2
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0124JUD004285202
24 janvier 2008
Hence, the effect of this provision is to require the existence of an effective remedy to deal with the substance of an “arguable complaint” and to grant appropriate relief (see Kudła v.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:001-216154
2 février 2022
Hence, exceptional circumstances in the instant supervision process have not materialized. III. CONCLUSION 67.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0313DEC003290104
13 mars 2007
Hence it concluded that the requirements of sections 1(1a) and 1(1b) of the Property Act (see “Relevant domestic law and practice” below) were not met.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-219835
15 septembre 2022
The appeal, so far as it concerned that order, was hence to be referred back to the lower panel (see paragraph 20 below). 17 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0524DEC001983921
24 mai 2022
evidence, and having regard to the relevant statutory guidance issued by the Equality and Human Rights Commission (see paragraph 28 below) the court concluded that AIHA’s housing allocation scheme, and hence
ECLI:CEDH:001-216155
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1218JUD001397903
18 décembre 2008
; With regard to the compatibility ratione temporis , the Court notes that on the date of introduction of the application the judgment of 21 January 1998 remained unenforced, and the Court is hence