CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

1 493 résultats pour « Alexandre BECAUD »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0104DEC006762310

Admin. suprême

4 janvier 2012

4 janvier 2012

xa0; January 2012 as a Chamber composed of:   Anatoly Kovler, President,   Peer Lorenzen,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

Page 37 sur 75

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0705DEC001712710

Admin. suprême

5 juillet 2011

5 juillet 2011

Chamber composed of:   Nina Vajić, President,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   George Nicolaou,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0124DEC001581103

Admin. suprême

24 janvier 2012

24 janvier 2012

xa0; January 2012 as a Chamber composed of:   Nina Vajić, President,   Anatoly Kovler,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0107DEC006764810

Admin. suprême

7 janvier 2014

7 janvier 2014

On 19 February 2009 the Supreme Court declined to examine the Committee’s appeal and the Court of Appeal’s judgment became final. 8.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1125JUD004214917

Admin. suprême

25 novembre 2021

25 novembre 2021

    On 1 June 2015 Mr X challenged the Supreme Court decision before the Constitutional Court, alleging that it had breached his right to a lawful judge because the issue of bias on the part

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GCREFERRALS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2713367-2960989

Admin. suprême

21 avril 2009

21 avril 2009

Contributions to the National Insurance Fund could not be equated to contributions to a private pension scheme, because the money was used, together with money provided from general taxation, to finance

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0222DEC000050215

Admin. suprême

22 février 2022

22 février 2022

Several complaints raised by the applicants through their representatives and arguing that all the seized property had been acquired lawfully, and that their right to defend themselves had been breached because

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1126DEC002674008

Admin. suprême

26 novembre 2013

26 novembre 2013

    By a letter of 23 April 2013, the applicants expressed the view that the Government’s unilateral declaration should not be accepted by the Court because the amount proposed by the Government

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1960482-2060903

Admin. suprême

27 mars 2007

27 mars 2007

    Principal facts   The applicants, Viorel Istratii, Alexandru Burcovschi and Roman Luţcan, are Moldovan nationals who were born in 1971, 1970 and 1976, respectively.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1105JUD003320320

Admin. suprême

5 novembre 2024

5 novembre 2024

Portuguese Republic lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Portuguese national, Ms   Tania Alexandra

Source officielle
CA

1ère chambre

68df5bd6cf4e7f1c37e1cc7b

Appel

2 octobre 2025

2 octobre 2025

COMPOSITION DE LA COUR LORS DU DÉLIBÉRÉ : Mme Isabelle Defarge, présidente de chambre, Mme Alexandra Berger, conseillère, Mme Audrey Gentilini, conseillère, GREFFIER : Mme Véronique Pellissier

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1122JUD000183710

Admin. suprême

22 novembre 2018

22 novembre 2018

Armenia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos, President,   Ksenija Turković,   Aleš Pejchal,   Krzysztof

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0111JUD002593508

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 2018

11 janvier 2018

Armenia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos, President,   Kristina Pardalos,   Krzysztof Wojtyczek,  

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0131JUD001852613

Admin. suprême

31 janvier 2019

31 janvier 2019

    No appeal on points of law was lodged against the decision of 23   March 2017, which became final. THE LAW I.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0922JUD001361688

Admin. suprême

22 septembre 1994

22 septembre 1994

Alexandre , avocat,   Counsel . The Court heard addresses by Miss Picard, Mr Bourgoin, Mr Weitzel and Mr Alexandre, and also replies to questions put by it and by one of its members.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0622JUD007673012

Admin. suprême

22 juin 2021

22 juin 2021

Her conviction became final on appeal on 8 July 2002.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1015JUD002751008

Admin. suprême

15 octobre 2015

15 octobre 2015

He travelled from Turkey to Switzerland and during the several days of the trial stayed in the Beau-Rivage Palace (p. 61).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0517JUD001901716

Admin. suprême

17 mai 2018

17 mai 2018

In the case of Ljatifi v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos, President,

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0925JUD007663911

Admin. suprême

25 septembre 2018

25 septembre 2018

    Lastly, the dispute was “directly decisive” for the right at issue because it resulted in the premature termination of the applicant’s exercise of that right.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1030DEC004369698

Admin. suprême

30 octobre 1998

30 octobre 1998

Federal Office for Refugees (Bundesamt für die Anerkennung ausländischer Flüchtlinge), the first applicant, a Coptic Orthodox Christian, stated that on 1 January 1991 he opened a jewellery shop in Alexandria

Source officielle