Ukraine , no. 15360/10, §§ 67-79, 1 July 2021) 9,800 250     8915/22 28/01/2022 Oleksandr Mykolayovych RAK 1985 Pustyntsev Andriy Vitaliyovych Dnipro Chernigiv Pre-Trial Detention Facility 01

In 2003 the Council of Ministers terminated the concession agreement on the ground that the companies had failed to fulfil their contractual and statutory obligations, notably those arising out of the

    After the arrest the applicant was taken to temporary detention facility no. IZ-47/1 in St Petersburg (“facility no. IZ-47/1”).

Some did not have bed linen, mattresses, sanitary facilities or heating.

    The applicant’s health deteriorated significantly and rapidly in the detention facility, where his health complaints were not addressed in any way, as the facility did not have any medical

For this reason, the experts considered that the applicant should not be kept in prison but rather transferred to an adequate medical facility.

EN FAIT 8.     Le requérant est né en 1942 et réside à Almada (Portugal). 9.

    On 5 March 2012 the applicant was taken to the Cherkasy pre-trial detention facility (“SIZO”). 7 .

(Z... ), domicilié [...] , pris en qualité d'administrateur judiciaire de la société Global Facility Services, 2°/ à M.

of the detention facility to return it.

[S] soutient en substance que : -il incombe à celui qui demande le prononcé d'une faillite personnelle d'établir les faits qui justifient une telle sanction, ce que ne fait pas le ministère public -l'absence

après septembre 2008 à la suite de la faillite de la banque Lehman Brothers ; Que plusieurs propositions de restructuration des titres ont été faites entre juillet et octobre 2008 par la Société Générale

GAYNUTDINOVA against Russia lodged on 25 January 2012 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged unlawfulness of the applicant’s continued involuntary treatment in a psychiatric facility

The courts went on to find that the bed sheets in the facility had been changed every week; that all cells had windows, and that the inmates had had access to natural light.

DE LA FAILLITE DE CETTE SOCIETE, CONSEQUENCE DES DELITS DE BANQUEROUTE REPROCHES AUX PREVENUS; "ALORS QU'AUX TERMES DES ARTICLES 2 ET 3 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE, SEUL UN PREJUDICE PRENANT DIRECTEMENT

l'émission d'un chèque sans provision de sa part le 21 avril 1986 ; qu'enfin, la cour d'appel qui, par motifs adoptés, avait constaté le caractère avantageux de la cession pour la société SICAR, du fait

COMPLAINTS The applicant alleges that his state of health was and remains incompatible with detention in a detention facility (such as a prison or a remand centre); that the refusal to release him and

In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at

Following the applicant’s transfer, on 21 June 2008, from the temporary detention facility of the OCU to detention facility No. 1., on 12 July 2008 the investigator inquired about the applicant’s state