CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

12 118 résultats pour « Wize »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0916JUD003270004

Admin. suprême

16 septembre 2008

16 septembre 2008

It found that M.I. and his wife had not been informed of the obligation to pay the fee or of the amount due. 12.

Source officielle

Page 36 sur 606

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-184725

Admin. suprême

26 juin 2018

26 juin 2018

On 27 March 2017 the applicant and his wife had a daughter E.F. who was born in Nizhniy Novgorod. 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0711JUD001501318

Admin. suprême

11 juillet 2024

11 juillet 2024

/10/2017,   Saratov Regional Court, 13/12/2017 no relevant or sufficient reasons to justify the search: applicant not a suspect, no adequate and sufficient safeguards against abuse: broad terms/wide

Source officielle
CJUE

CJUE

ECLI:EU:C:2012:269

CJUE

3 mai 2012

3 mai 2012

#World Wide Tobacco España, SA mot Europeiska kommissionen.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0704DEC001314587

Admin. suprême

4 juillet 1988

4 juillet 1988

  The applicant's wife obtained a court order on 23 July 1980 for return of the children and an injunction restraining the applicant from molesting his wife and her sister or going to where they lived

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1211JUD006781614

Admin. suprême

11 décembre 2018

11 décembre 2018

It stated that the applicant’s right not to testify against his wife would have been breached only if his wife had had the status of a suspect and not that of a witness.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1009JUD000587615

Admin. suprême

9 octobre 2018

9 octobre 2018

Since the assets had not been transferred to the Union-wide Council, they were not covered by those resolutions.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1009DEC004119502

Admin. suprême

9 octobre 2006

9 octobre 2006

According to the applicant, the trial judge was biased as his wife had started working with the insurer almost at the same time as the proceedings commenced.

Source officielle
CA

Pôle 6 - Chambre 4

6788a0a4a1dbfbd5d79cd64c

Appel

15 janvier 2025

15 janvier 2025

EXPOSE DU LITIGE Marie Brizard Wine & Spirits est un groupe spécialisé dans la distribution de vins et de spiritueux.

Source officielle
CA

Pôle 6 - Chambre 4

6788a0a4a1dbfbd5d79cd656

Appel

15 janvier 2025

15 janvier 2025

EXPOSE DU LITIGE Marie [U] Wine & Spirits est un groupe spécialisé dans la distribution de vins et de spiritueux.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0106DEC001450189

Admin. suprême

6 janvier 1992

6 janvier 1992

        His first wife stayed in Morocco with her children, i.e. the second applicant, his brother and four sisters.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0219DEC006590501

Admin. suprême

19 février 2002

19 février 2002

The applicant and his wife were married in 1980 and had one child, born in 1991. The applicant’s wife died on 13 February 2000.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-3759768-4295483

Admin. suprême

6 décembre 2011

6 décembre 2011

  On 21 September 2006 the court granted Mr Kılıç visiting and staying contact and ruled that he was to pay maintenance to his wife.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0917DEC004113514

Admin. suprême

17 septembre 2019

17 septembre 2019

The applicant’s wife, Ms   N.   Azimova, was listed in the application form as a second applicant in the case.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-109431

Admin. suprême

13 décembre 2011

13 décembre 2011

    Visits of the applicant’s wife and relatives The applicant is married and has a two-year old child.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0112DEC003224796

Admin. suprême

12 janvier 1999

12 janvier 1999

He further alleges discrimination on the ground of sex, as his divorced wife was entitled to take care of the then already six-year-old Jankl and four-year-old Yorrick.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1014DEC004560206

Admin. suprême

14 octobre 2008

14 octobre 2008

The courts were particularly concerned about the pressure the applicant might put on his wife, as well as about her well-being, since the applicant continued to live with her at the same address.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1714447-1797320

Admin. suprême

27 juin 2006

27 juin 2006

  On 11 July 1999 the applicant’s 27-year-old wife was about to give birth to their child, H. She was admitted to a Wrocław Medical Academy hospital at 8 p.m.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0825DEC002023018

Admin. suprême

25 août 2022

25 août 2022

in respect of allocation to a remote colony       50117/19 16/09/2019 Viktor Gennadyevich BARDAKOV 1979     IK-8 Komi Republic The applicant is a detainee, his relatives are: wife

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2349165-2534057

Admin. suprême

13 mai 2008

13 mai 2008

The applicant’s lawyer, informed by the applicant’s wife about the ill-treatment, managed to have him moved to a different cell, where he was again assaulted and humiliated.

Source officielle