CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0516DEC007558717
16 mai 2023
The latter provided, for example, that on the basis of the available evidence there were “no doubts”, that it was “indisputable” that the facts as described had taken place, and that the applicant’s acts
Page 36 sur 126
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0430DEC004147898
30 avril 2002
Having regard to the medical reports obtained on 10 and 21 November 1995, he considered that, apart from the applicant’s allegations, there was no evidence that the applicant had been subjected to torture
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1002JUD002287704
2 octobre 2008
the remedies were effective and available in theory and in practice at the relevant time, that is to say that they were accessible, were capable of providing redress in respect of the applicant’s complaints
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0510JUD004660299
10 mai 2007
s mother and other day care children's parents showed that there had been changes in their children's behaviour after they had been in contact with the applicant.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0521JUD007075812
21 mai 2015
Likewise, the Government did not provide any evidence that there existed any relevant domestic judicial practice.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0917JUD003505204
17 septembre 2009
They stated that at about 8 p.m. on 10 June 2003 Ali Zabiyev had run towards them and told them that the ZIL lorry had been fired at.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0608JUD001641990
8 juin 1995
they would abscond if released, that danger was ruled out in their case as they had publicly stated that they would be returning to Turkey to put their party on a lawful footing; and the differences of
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0514JUD002181003
14 mai 2009
They also requested that the first applicant be admitted to the proceedings as a victim. 32.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0324JUD002191103
24 mars 2009
The Constitutional Court considered that persons whose title to property had been confirmed by a court decision could not be compelled to surrender that property where there was no serious justification
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1102JUD004172306
2 novembre 2010
The Government maintained in their observations that they had been unable to find the permits referred to by the applicant, thus they could not confirm that the permits contained requirements
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-210457
17 mai 2021
It stressed that since the applicants’ detention had ended with the execution of the deportation order and the voluntary return to the country of origin, respectively, they could lodge their compensation
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0713JUD006949801
13 juillet 2004
They submitted that the latter had breached the principle of equality before the law enshrined in Article 6 of the Andorran Constitution and that they had breached Article 10 (right to judicial protection
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0323DEC003941011
23 mars 2021
They may also be used when moving and escorting prisoners whose behaviour indicates that they could abscond or harm themselves or others. 21 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0117JUD007415301
17 janvier 2006
Neither did they dispute the surface area of the house. They finally stated that restitutio in integrum would be sufficient just satisfaction. 9.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0630JUD002075508
30 juin 2022
As to the second applicant, they noted that his monthly salary as a chief editor was AZN 160 and that the sum of AZN 25,000 amounted to many times more than his yearly income.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0117JUD003313806
17 janvier 2008
Accordingly, the Court considers that there is no call to award him any sum on that account. C. Default interest 49.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0611DEC003867897
11 juin 2002
It is incumbent on the Government claiming non-exhaustion to convince the Court that the remedy was an effective one available in theory and in practice at the relevant time, that is to say, that it was
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0720JUD004794099
20 juillet 2004
I then asked him if they had hurt him. He answered that they had hurt him a little and pointed to the left side of his face saying that it was hurting there.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0929DEC002777308
29 septembre 2015
They also argued that the applicants had lodged their application out of time.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0128DEC002621611
28 janvier 2014
They emphasised that the Act on Compensation for Excessive Duration of Judicial Proceedings had entered into force on 1 January 2010.