CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0502JUD003571897
2 mai 2000
In particular, he had found it difficult to get the second applicant to concentrate on what he was saying to her. 15.
Page 36 sur 194
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0703JUD003030516
3 juillet 2018
He also argued that the provisions of the CCP allowing the bailiff to stay the execution while a criminal complaint was ongoing were unconstitutional in so far as it allowed the debtor − in bad faith −
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1030JUD002267710
30 octobre 2018
The Tüpraş executives mainly made the following arguments in their defence statements.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1007JUD001277303
7 octobre 2010
This was consistent with the applicant's statement of 29 July 1999 and the statement of medical officer N.G. It was impossible to examine the bullet, because it had not been found.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0113JUD001556202
13 janvier 2009
While resisting arrest, he slapped and kicked police officer M.K on the right thigh.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1110JUD001574115
10 novembre 2022
While entering the police car, she had kicked through a window.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0527JUD005178122
27 mai 2025
at any point while he was in a prone position.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0307JUD002722717
7 mars 2023
If it were otherwise, the right to manifest religious beliefs would be subject to the whim or discretion of a State or religious authority, including as to the time, place and manner of expression.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0318JUD005527617
18 mars 2021
Nor is this what happened.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0324DEC006712801
24 mars 2005
The road has a horizontal sign - a full white line ... ...”
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1015JUD000194208
15 octobre 2013
He confirmed the content of his police statements before the prosecutor in the absence of a lawyer. 8.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0522DEC005274899
22 mai 2001
Moreover, in this respect the contracting States enjoy a certain margin of appreciation in assessing whether and to what extent differences in otherwise similar situations justify a difference in treatment
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-167157
6 septembre 2016
The judges hearing the case did not react to the applicant’s statements at the time. 5.
ECLI:CEDH:001-117511
21 février 2013
have, an established system of State education.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1207DEC005011599
7 décembre 2000
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0830DEC007268301
30 août 2005
if the person who disseminated such statements does not prove their truthfulness.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0604DEC003890815
4 juin 2024
In other words, only those liable to a sentence of life imprisonment without daytime isolation could be eligible for a reduction to thirty years’ imprisonment, while those liable to a sentence of life
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0604DEC002040216
ECLI:CEDH:001-127372
23 septembre 2013
The first applicant lives in Kloštar Ivanić, while the second and third applicants live in Kaštel Stari. They are represented before the Court by Ms L. Kušan, a lawyer practising in Ivanić-Grad. A.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0926JUD003534905
26 septembre 2006
This made their situation incompatible with the obligations undertaken by the State under the Convention. 54.