CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

15 653 résultats pour « Frech »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-225612

Admin. suprême

1 juin 2023

1 juin 2023

of detention during transport     29030/19* 24/05/2019 Anton Dmitriyevich PRONIN 1988 Aleksey Mikhaylovich Urlashov St Petersburg van 15/12/2017 to 24/01/2019 0.3 m²     lack of fresh

Source officielle

Page 36 sur 783

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0208JUD001265614

Admin. suprême

8 février 2018

8 février 2018

12656/14 31/01/2014 Marius Rădulescu 18/10/1963   Galați Penitentiary 23/08/2012 to 01/04/2014 1 year and 7 months and 10 days 2 m² overcrowding, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of fresh

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-49587

Admin. suprême

7 février 1995

7 février 1995

Ministers decided, in accordance with Article 32, paragraph 2 (art. 32-2), of the Convention, that the Government of France was to pay the applicant as just satisfaction, within three months, 15 000 French

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-55786

Admin. suprême

12 novembre 1998

12 novembre 1998

francs in respect of pecuniary damage; - held, that the respondent State was to pay the applicant, within three months 100   000 French francs in respect of non-pecuniary damage; - held that the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-52259

Admin. suprême

30 avril 2002

30 avril 2002

francs in respect of non-pecuniary damage and 5 000 French francs in respect of costs and expenses, namely a total sum of 55 000 French francs, and that interest would be payable on any unpaid sum, calculated

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-7856

Admin. suprême

26 septembre 1997

26 septembre 1997

France - 25017/94 Judgment 26.9.1997 Article 8 Expulsion Article 8-1 Respect for family life Respect for private life Enforcement of order for permanent exclusion from French territory of convicted Algerian

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-52275

Admin. suprême

24 avril 2003

24 avril 2003

April 1999, in accordance with former Article 32, paragraph 2, of the Convention, that the government of the respondent state was to pay the applicant as just satisfaction, within three months, 50 000 French

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56221

Admin. suprême

24 avril 2003

24 avril 2003

an application (No. 34553/97) against France, lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 17 December 1996 under former Article 25 of the Convention by Ms Michelle Christine Dulaurans, a French

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3962

Admin. suprême

29 mars 2005

29 mars 2005

representation of an absent appellant: violation   Facts : The applicant, an Algerian national resident in France, was the subject of a deportation order and attempts were made to remove him from French

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-51098

Admin. suprême

15 juillet 1999

15 juillet 1999

, in   accordance with Article 32, paragraph   2, of the Convention, that the Government of the respondent State was to pay the applicant as just satisfaction, within three months, 80 000 French

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68246-68714

Admin. suprême

14 mars 2000

14 mars 2000

The judgment exists only in French.   Section 3   3)   Cloez v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-50372

Admin. suprême

8 octobre 1999

8 octobre 1999

in   accordance with Article 32, paragraph   2, of the Convention, that the Government of the respondent State was to pay each applicant, as just satisfaction, within three months, 75 000 French

Source officielle
TCOM

8ème chambre

69ef8176cdc6046d47b9e88a

Commerce

2 juillet 2025

2 juillet 2025

TRIBUNAL DES ACTIVITES ECONOMIQUES DE NANTERRE JUGEMENT DU 2 Juillet 2025 8ème Chambre N° PCL : 2025J00688 SARL FRESH FRUITS N° RG : 2025P00733 DEBITEUR SARL FRESH FRUITS [Adresse 1] RCS NANTERRE :

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-51696

Admin. suprême

3 décembre 1999

3 décembre 1999

, in   accordance with Article 32, paragraph   2, of the Convention, that the Government of the respondent State was to pay the applicant as just satisfaction, within three months, 60 000 French

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56386

Admin. suprême

20 juillet 2004

20 juillet 2004

in an application (No. 44211/98) against France, lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 10 June 1998 under former Article 25 of the Convention by Mr   Richard   Lacombe, a French

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-52271

Admin. suprême

17 juin 2003

17 juin 2003

francs in respect of non-pecuniary damage and 5   000   French francs in respect of costs and expenses, namely a total sum of 65   000   French francs, and that interest should be

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-51099

Admin. suprême

15 juillet 1999

15 juillet 1999

xa0; accordance with Article   32, paragraph   2, of the Convention, that the Government of the respondent State was to pay each applicant as just satisfaction, within three months, 70 000 French

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-51945

Admin. suprême

12 novembre 1998

12 novembre 1998

April 1998, in   accordance with Article 32, paragraph 2, of the Convention, that the government of the respondent State was to pay the applicant as just satisfaction, within three months, 30 000 French

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-51109

Admin. suprême

3 décembre 1999

3 décembre 1999

June 1999, in accordance with Article 32, paragraph   2, of the Convention, that the Government of the respondent State was to pay the applicant as just satisfaction, within three months, 40 000 French

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-52211

Admin. suprême

26 février 2001

26 février 2001

francs in respect of all kinds of damages and 5 000 French francs in respect of costs and expenses, namely a total sum of 35 000 French francs, and that interest should be payable on any unpaid sum, calculated

Source officielle