CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

17 343 résultats pour « Delpy »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56016

Admin. suprême

3 octobre 2001

3 octobre 2001

judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 13 July 2000 in the Scozzari and Giunta case, in which the Court notably found two violations of Article 8 of the Convention on account, first, of the delays

Source officielle

Page 36 sur 868

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4938

Admin. suprême

24 avril 2003

24 avril 2003

In that respect, while the initial proceedings were conducted with exemplary speed there were important delays thereafter.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-103897

Admin. suprême

30 novembre 2010

30 novembre 2010

  Execution of the pilot judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case Yuriy Nikolayevich Ivanov against Ukraine and of 386 cases against Ukraine concerning the failure or serious delay

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-106340

Admin. suprême

30 novembre 2010

30 novembre 2010

  Execution of the pilot judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case Yuriy Nikolayevich Ivanov against Ukraine and of 386 cases against Ukraine concerning the failure or serious delay

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-7828

Admin. suprême

22 octobre 1997

22 octobre 1997

had been due either to procedural requirements or to conduct of parties – early hearing dates had been given on each occasion and judgments delivered without delay – length of proceedings not excessive

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2731

Admin. suprême

3 mai 2007

3 mai 2007

two remedies to expedite pending proceedings – a supervisory appeal and a motion for a deadline– and, ultimately, for a claim for just satisfaction in respect of damage sustained because of the undue delay

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0220DEC001635003

Admin. suprême

20 février 2007

20 février 2007

On 16 October 2002, the Constitutional Court found a violation of the applicant’s right to have her claim determined without unjustified delay.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0424DEC002583723

Admin. suprême

24 avril 2025

24 avril 2025

obstructive pulmonary disease), CHD (ischemic heart disease), pulmonary insufficiency, cardiosclerosis, hypertension, obesity, insulin resistance, chronic disturbance of cerebral circulation lack of/delay

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12607

Admin. suprême

1 octobre 2019

1 octobre 2019

Although a delay in the execution of a judgment might be justified in particular circumstances, the Government had not offered any justification for the authorities’ inaction in the applicants’ case.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-204308

Admin. suprême

7 juillet 2020

7 juillet 2020

delays could not be regarded as compatible with the State’s obligation under Article 2 to ensure the effectiveness of investigations into suspicious deaths.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1127DEC002482894

Admin. suprême

27 novembre 1996

27 novembre 1996

    The applicant complains of the excessive delay in the proceedings in his case.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1207JUD003216309

Admin. suprême

7 décembre 2017

7 décembre 2017

The Court finds that part of the reasons for these delays is attributable to the State. 42.

Source officielle
CA

Cour d'Appel

6253c99ebd3db21cbdd88d0a

Appel

14 juin 2006

14 juin 2006

Ameur Z... et Fatma Y... se sont mariés le 2 décembre 1958 à BOUMERDES commune de Dellys (Algérie), sans contrat de mariage préalable.Neuf enfants, aujourd'hui majeurs, sont issus de cette union.Autorisée

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1122DEC001329502

Admin. suprême

22 novembre 2007

22 novembre 2007

However, they considered that the delay could not be attributed solely to the national authorities.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0503DEC003453902

Admin. suprême

3 mai 2005

3 mai 2005

Taking into account the number of duties that the Court of Appeal had to accomplish, such delay could not be considered excessive.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0617JUD006023100

Admin. suprême

17 juin 2003

17 juin 2003

    Article 48 (2) of the Constitution provides, inter alia , that every person has the right to have his or her case tried without unjustified delay. 11.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0509DEC006394600

Admin. suprême

9 mai 2006

9 mai 2006

She invited the Constitutional Court to find a   recurring violation of her right under Article 48 § 2 of the Constitutional Court to a   hearing without unjustified delay, and under Article

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1103DEC003802003

Admin. suprême

3 novembre 2005

3 novembre 2005

Thus, a delay of approximately nine months is attributable to the applicant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0617JUD005499600

Admin. suprême

17 juin 2003

17 juin 2003

    Article 48 (2) of the Constitution provides, inter alia , that every person has the right to have his or her case tried without unjustified delay. 13.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1105JUD004529099

Admin. suprême

5 novembre 2002

5 novembre 2002

These delays amounted to a global period of less than one year.

Source officielle