CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-56016
3 octobre 2001
judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 13 July 2000 in the Scozzari and Giunta case, in which the Court notably found two violations of Article 8 of the Convention on account, first, of the delays
Page 36 sur 868
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4938
24 avril 2003
In that respect, while the initial proceedings were conducted with exemplary speed there were important delays thereafter.
ECLI:CEDH:001-103897
30 novembre 2010
Execution of the pilot judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case Yuriy Nikolayevich Ivanov against Ukraine and of 386 cases against Ukraine concerning the failure or serious delay
ECLI:CEDH:001-106340
ECLI:CEDH:002-7828
22 octobre 1997
had been due either to procedural requirements or to conduct of parties – early hearing dates had been given on each occasion and judgments delivered without delay – length of proceedings not excessive
ECLI:CEDH:002-2731
3 mai 2007
two remedies to expedite pending proceedings – a supervisory appeal and a motion for a deadline– and, ultimately, for a claim for just satisfaction in respect of damage sustained because of the undue delay
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0220DEC001635003
20 février 2007
On 16 October 2002, the Constitutional Court found a violation of the applicant’s right to have her claim determined without unjustified delay.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0424DEC002583723
24 avril 2025
obstructive pulmonary disease), CHD (ischemic heart disease), pulmonary insufficiency, cardiosclerosis, hypertension, obesity, insulin resistance, chronic disturbance of cerebral circulation lack of/delay
ECLI:CEDH:002-12607
1 octobre 2019
Although a delay in the execution of a judgment might be justified in particular circumstances, the Government had not offered any justification for the authorities’ inaction in the applicants’ case.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-204308
7 juillet 2020
delays could not be regarded as compatible with the State’s obligation under Article 2 to ensure the effectiveness of investigations into suspicious deaths.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1127DEC002482894
27 novembre 1996
The applicant complains of the excessive delay in the proceedings in his case.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1207JUD003216309
7 décembre 2017
The Court finds that part of the reasons for these delays is attributable to the State. 42.
Cour d'Appel
6253c99ebd3db21cbdd88d0a
14 juin 2006
Ameur Z... et Fatma Y... se sont mariés le 2 décembre 1958 à BOUMERDES commune de Dellys (Algérie), sans contrat de mariage préalable.Neuf enfants, aujourd'hui majeurs, sont issus de cette union.Autorisée
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1122DEC001329502
22 novembre 2007
However, they considered that the delay could not be attributed solely to the national authorities.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0503DEC003453902
3 mai 2005
Taking into account the number of duties that the Court of Appeal had to accomplish, such delay could not be considered excessive.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0617JUD006023100
17 juin 2003
Article 48 (2) of the Constitution provides, inter alia , that every person has the right to have his or her case tried without unjustified delay. 11.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0509DEC006394600
9 mai 2006
She invited the Constitutional Court to find a recurring violation of her right under Article 48 § 2 of the Constitutional Court to a hearing without unjustified delay, and under Article
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1103DEC003802003
3 novembre 2005
Thus, a delay of approximately nine months is attributable to the applicant.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0617JUD005499600
Article 48 (2) of the Constitution provides, inter alia , that every person has the right to have his or her case tried without unjustified delay. 13.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1105JUD004529099
5 novembre 2002
These delays amounted to a global period of less than one year.