CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-5500
25 septembre 2001
On 4 March 1995, the Chief Constable, who was on annual leave, gave oral authorisation to proceed.
Page 36 sur 118
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1024DEC004478798
24 octobre 2000
The Chief Constable stated that the use of the device was to be reviewed on a daily basis.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0926JUD001785191
26 septembre 1995
Damman , P. Becker , O. Jäckel , avocats, conseils . La Cour a entendu en leurs déclarations M. Trechsel, Me Becker, Me Jäckel, Me Damman et M.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-108085
2 décembre 2011
The European Court recalled its constant case-law according to which the chronic overload of a court does not provide a valid justification for the length of proceedings, and that Article
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-167617
20 septembre 2016
By section 1(1) of the State and Municipalities Liability for Damage Act 1988, the State is liable for damage suffered by individuals or legal persons as a result of unlawful decisions, actions
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0401JUD000954905
1 avril 2010
The Court reiterates its constant approach that a jurisdictional error, a serious breach of court procedure or abuses of power may, in principle, be regarded as a fundamental defect and therefore justify
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0205DEC002105611
5 février 2013
establishes that prescription does not apply, in particular, to the claims for the protection of personal non-pecuniary rights and other intangible assets and to the claims for compensation for the damage
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0515DEC002391909
15 mai 2018
Article 413 of the Civil Code entitles an individual to request compensation for non-pecuniary damage caused in respect of damage to his or her health.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1104DEC004913021
4 novembre 2025
Holding S.R.L., registered on 27 August 1999 in Constanţa (“the applicant company”) and represented by Mrs M. Veriotti and Mr A.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1102JUD001307103
2 novembre 2006
Damage 63. The applicant claimed a total amount of 35,089.08 euros (EUR) in respect of pecuniary damage.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0325DEC004408298
25 mars 2004
According to the constant case ‑ law of the Bulgarian courts, compensation was due for damage sustained as a result of detention imposed in the course of criminal proceedings which had later been
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0404DEC006394509
4 avril 2017
By a final judgment of 1 October 2008 the Constanţa Court of Appeal allowed the action brought by the applicants.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1012JUD001543719
12 octobre 2021
Damage 34. The applicant claimed 24,965 euros (EUR) in respect of pecuniary damage, arising from alimony payments. 35.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0606DEC003992022
6 juin 2024
Lastly, it stated that there were other possible ways for the applicant to obtain compensation for the damage suffered. 10.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0701JUD004225504
1 juillet 2010
Damage 35. The applicant claimed 30,000 euros (EUR) in respect of non-pecuniary damage. 36.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0912DEC003679097
12 septembre 2000
The Government do not suggest that there is an established line of authorities in Scottish law where damages have in fact been awarded in situations analogous to the present case.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0708JUD002904114
8 juillet 2025
Each applicant claimed 15,000 euros (EUR) in respect of non ‑ pecuniary damage.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2055614-2175323
12 juillet 2007
Under Article 41 (just satisfaction) of the Convention, the Court awarded Ms Testa 15,000 euros (EUR) in respect of non-pecuniary damage and EUR 3,200 for costs and expenses.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1102JUD006847901
(d) Action for damages against E.D. for deprivation of possession 19.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0405JUD003306010
5 avril 2016
Damage 93.