During the trial, the applicant, while represented by a defence counsel, was not assisted by his guardian who had declined to continue to act as the guardian because of his own advanced age, and proceedings

      The applicant first complains that he was denied a fair hearing contrary to Article 6 para. 1 (Art. 6-1) of the Convention because the trial judge incorrectly charged the

  This was so because by accepting the motion for aggravation of the accusation, the judges had in fact formed a preconceived opinion on the case.

He contends that his detention was not covered by Article 5 because it was disproportionate and arbitrary, and because he was not given reasons for his detention.

The court further noted that the applicant might also abscond because he had several forged passports issued in different names.

Toque n° [Adresse 6] * Monsieur [M] [H] [Adresse 7] DEMANDEUR - représenté(e) par Maître [B] [Y] -[Adresse 8] * la société AXA FRANCE IARD SA [Adresse 9] DÉFENDEUR - représenté(e) par Maître Maxime BERTHAUD

Béchara X... et de la SCP Vier, Barthélemy, avocat du Conseil national de l'ordre des médecins, - les conclusions de M.

Achille, Henri, Pierre X..., demeurant tous trois à Bezeaud, Viam, Bugeat (Corrèze), défendeurs à la cassation ; Le demandeur invoque, à l'appui de son pourvoi, le moyen unique de cassation annexé

A..., représentée par Me Béchiau, doit être regardée comme demandant au tribunal : 1°) d’annuler les décisions du 6 août 2025 par lesquelles le préfet de police a refusé de l’admettre au séjour, l’

B A, représenté par Me Béchiau, demande au tribunal : 1°) de l'admettre provisoirement au bénéfice de l'aide juridictionnelle ; 2°) d'annuler la décision du préfet du Val-de-Marne ayant refusé d'enregistrer

par la SCP CALAS, avoués à la Cour COMPOSITION DE LA COUR : LORS DES DÉBATS ET DU DÉLIBÉRÉ : Monsieur Allain URAN, Président de chambre, Madame Christiane BEROUJON, Conseiller, Monsieur Jean-Louis BERNAUD

domicilié en cette qualité audit siège [Adresse 3] [Adresse 3] défaillante COMPOSITION DE LA COUR : LORS DU DELIBERE : Monsieur Daniel MULLER, Président de Chambre, Monsieur Jean-Louis BERNAUD

en cette qualité audit siège [Adresse 10] [Localité 5] défaillante COMPOSITION DE LA COUR : LORS DU DELIBERE : Monsieur Daniel MULLER, Président de Chambre, Monsieur Jean-Louis BERNAUD

However, the preparation of the case was initially extended to 31 January 2000 because of the defendants' failure to appear and subsequently extended to 14   February 2000 because of the judge's holiday

Two hearings were adjourned because the applicant's husband's lawyer studied the case file for ten days and because the applicant's husband drafted an amended statement of claim. 9.

He also reiterated the applicant’s wish to be present at his hearing, however difficult this might be to realise because of the constraints of the Covid-19 lockdown. 15 .

That was because they needed to take care of her husband’s elderly and sick stepmother.

She maintained that the application should not be considered because the application did not advance any new reasons that would warrant a review of the existing judgments and because the deputy President