It is incumbent on the Government claiming non-exhaustion to satisfy the Court that the remedy was an effective one available in theory and in practice at the relevant time, that is to say, that it was

In this connection, they referred to Berić and Others (cited above). They further argued that the application was completely vague and unsubstantiated.

C-G.E. which suggested that there existed such a link.

It stated that there was insufficient evidence to enable them to consider that there had been any defamation by the defendants.

This evidence, taken with the other available evidence, made it difficult to explain how the victims could have been shot by a third person and made the theory that Maria F. had shot her husband and child

    Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention;   3.

It follows that the applicant’s salary in these years amounted to less than 50% of the average remuneration. 29.

If it transpired that the facts of the offence were less serious than those that originally justified the charge, the judge should normally, by an appropriate sentence, be able to ensure that there was

    The applicants alleged that they had been detained in inhuman and degrading conditions and that they had not had effective domestic remedies at their disposal in that connection. 4.

the remedies were effective and available in theory and in practice at the relevant time, that is to say that they were accessible, were capable of providing redress in respect of the applicant’s complaints

The Court therefore finds that there is no reason to doubt that the deprivation was in accordance with the law, as required by Article 1 of Protocol No. 1. (iii)     Legitimate aim 44.

the remedies were effective and available in theory and in practice at the relevant time, that is to say that they were accessible, were capable of providing redress in respect of the applicants' complaints

In the present case the applicants could have had no more than a mere hope that they would acquire such a right, but it could not be said that they had ever had a legitimate expectation to be able to build

  For the purpose of securing that the tax authorities received timely, sufficient and correct information from taxpayers, there were provisions stipulating that under certain circumstances the tax

Secondly, there is no provision in the Constitution stipulating that a person who wears a headscarf cannot be an MP and that she cannot take the oath in Parliament in a headscarf.

The court further considered that there was a substantial risk that the documents would be withheld, corrupted or destroyed if they were returned. 19.

    On 24 March 2005 the SDEA informed the applicant that, at that time, there were more than 25,000 IDPs temporarily settled in the Surakhany District.

They indicated that the question arose whether her death had been caused by shortcomings in her medical treatment and that they intended to claim damages in that respect.

    The Supreme Court also made a lengthy analysis of the transcripts, thus responding to the defendants’ allegations that they had been obtained unlawfully and that they could not be used as