to their margin of appreciation, authorities could not be said not to have had relevant and sufficient reasons for maintaining prohibition thereafter.

  If it is not, it shall lift the prohibition.   43.

Conclusion : no violation (eight votes to one). II.

Lithuania (no. 44558/98, 24.7.2001 §§ 94-97, ECHR 2001-VIII) and Puzinas (no. 1) v. Lithuania (no. 44800/98, 14.3.2002, §§ 15-17). THE LAW I.

    This directive should not interfere with decisions made by member States concerning the use or non-use of any specific type of human cells, including germ cells and embryonic stem cells.

administration: no violation   Facts : The applicant is the president of an organisation for prisoners' mutual assistance and support.

Neither the mother nor grandmother spoke much English; no Pushtu interpreter was provided.

No violations of Art. 8;Violation of Art. 8;Non-pecuniary damage - award

overcrowding at the time had not reached dramatic proportions.

A consultant paediatrician interviewed the applicants and M.’s grandmother about the origin of the injury, but they did not speak much English and had no interpreter.

However, no restrictions applied to new agreements in respect of apartments which did not come within the scope of the 1922 Rent Act, i.e. principally apartments in new houses. 29.

    The Government pleaded non-exhaustion of domestic remedies. 15.     The applicant contested that argument, claiming that the remedies available were not effective. 16.

;   no fault of his own.

However, the Court was not required to determine whether or not the prohibition of gamete donation was now justified under the Convention, but whether that measure was justified at the time when the Austrian

commercial et du nom de domaine.

AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE SOCIALE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Attendu, selon l'arrêt attaqué, que M.

commercial "Alu Plus", l'arrêt retient que la société CAR avait pour nom commercial "Alu Plus" et que la société GTI était initialement connue sous ce nom comme indiqué à l'acte d'acquisition du 1er juin

comparante, non représentée - L'UDAF de la Moselle, non comparante, non représentée contre - Monsieur [X] [I], tiers, non comparant, non représenté - Le directeur de l'[V] d'[Localité 1] -

AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE SOCIALE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur les pourvois n°s A/91-60.026 et B/91-60.027 formés par : 1°) le syndicat CGT force ouvrière des employés