CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0703JUD003205109
3 juillet 2012
On 27 March 2003 the Bursa Assize Court acquitted ten of the officers, finding that none of the complainants, except for the applicant, had been ill-treated and that those ten officers had
Page 35 sur 1230
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0727JUD004372602
27 juillet 2006
This decision was not appealed against and on 17 March 2002 became final. 8. On 21 March 2002 the court issued a writ of execution.
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68451-68919
25 mars 1999
That court acquitted them in 1991, finding that they had not acted as de jure or de facto managers.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0515DEC002585294
15 mai 1996
As the order was only served on the applicant's counsel on 7 March 1994, the applicant, on 3 March 1994, could not validly waive his right to appeal.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1216DEC003638722
16 décembre 2025
On 25 January 2017 the Supreme Court dismissed the applicant’s application for the protection of legality, reiterating the findings of the Supreme Court in its decision of 17 December 2014. 12.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-157718
7 septembre 2015
Furthermore, the Frankfurt am Main Regional Court’s judgment of 13 March 2008 was based on that violation of the Convention.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1023JUD006031821
23 octobre 2025
of the applicants’ final sentencing to life imprisonment (see the appended table) to 3 March 2023.
ECLI:CEDH:001-183737
15 mai 2018
On 20 March 2001 the Bozcaada Magistrates’ Court decided that, pursuant to section 1(4) of Law no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0424JUD006987501
24 avril 2008
On 5 March 2001 the Štip Court of First Instance dismissed the applicant’s claim as ill-founded.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0912DEC007766414
12 septembre 2017
On 17 March 2008 the Split Office, relying on the findings of the experts, granted the applicant a disability pension, starting from 19 December 2007.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:1014DEC001963092
14 octobre 1994
The reason for the re-assessment was that the company was found to have declared purchases of trade marks with a view to reducing its tax liability even though no such trade marks were actually
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0502JUD001878611
2 mai 2013
Domančić (“the applicant”), on 1 March 2011. 2.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-55883
2 octobre 2000
{ page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Resolution ResDH(2000)112 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 21 March
ECLI:CEDH:001-155241
19 mai 2015
On 2 March 2007 the first-instance court awarded the claim.
ECLI:CEDH:001-248642
19 décembre 2025
On 22 March 2011, following disciplinary proceedings against the applicant, she permanently lost the right to practice as a bailiff. She received that decision on 5 April 2011.
ECLI:CEDH:001-55903
18 décembre 2000
{ page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Resolution ResDH(2000)139 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 28 March
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0120DEC004224417
20 janvier 2022
In March 2021 the new developments occurred at the national level. On 9 March 2021 the applicant withdrew his civil claim within the framework of the criminal case against Mr P.
ECLI:CEDH:001-250472
6 mai 2026
On 28 March 2016 the applicant was involved in the traffic accident for which, according to the findings issued on the same day by the traffic police, he was held responsible.
ECLI:CEDH:001-141748
13 février 2014
On 27 and 28 March 2008 the applicant was further examined in Ohrid Hospital.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0108DEC000260006
8 janvier 2013
On 4 March 2004 the applicant was once again examined by a forensic doctor, who noted that there were no injuries other than those observed in the medical report of 3 March 2004. 9.