CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

24 588 résultats pour « Marc FINKINE »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0703JUD003205109

Admin. suprême

3 juillet 2012

3 juillet 2012

    On 27 March 2003 the Bursa Assize Court acquitted ten of the officers, finding that none of the complainants, except for the applicant, had been ill-treated and that those ten officers had

Page 35 sur 1230

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0727JUD004372602

Admin. suprême

27 juillet 2006

27 juillet 2006

This decision was not appealed against and on 17   March 2002 became final. 8.     On 21 March 2002 the court issued a writ of execution.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68451-68919

Admin. suprême

25 mars 1999

25 mars 1999

That court acquitted them in 1991, finding that they had not acted as de jure or de facto managers.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0515DEC002585294

Admin. suprême

15 mai 1996

15 mai 1996

As the order was only served on the applicant's counsel on 7 March 1994, the applicant, on 3 March 1994, could not validly waive his right to appeal.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1216DEC003638722

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 2025

16 décembre 2025

On 25 January 2017 the Supreme Court dismissed the applicant’s application for the protection of legality, reiterating the findings of the Supreme Court in its decision of 17 December 2014. 12.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-157718

Admin. suprême

7 septembre 2015

7 septembre 2015

Furthermore, the Frankfurt am Main Regional Court’s judgment of 13 March 2008 was based on that violation of the Convention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1023JUD006031821

Admin. suprême

23 octobre 2025

23 octobre 2025

of the applicants’ final sentencing to life imprisonment (see the appended table) to 3 March 2023.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-183737

Admin. suprême

15 mai 2018

15 mai 2018

On 20 March 2001 the Bozcaada Magistrates’ Court decided that, pursuant to section 1(4) of Law no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0424JUD006987501

Admin. suprême

24 avril 2008

24 avril 2008

On 5 March 2001 the Štip Court of First Instance dismissed the applicant’s claim as ill-founded.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0912DEC007766414

Admin. suprême

12 septembre 2017

12 septembre 2017

    On 17 March 2008 the Split Office, relying on the findings of the experts, granted the applicant a disability pension, starting from 19   December 2007.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:1014DEC001963092

Admin. suprême

14 octobre 1994

14 octobre 1994

  The reason for the re-assessment was that the company was found to have declared purchases of trade marks with a view to reducing its tax liability even though no such trade marks were actually

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0502JUD001878611

Admin. suprême

2 mai 2013

2 mai 2013

Domančić (“the applicant”), on 1 March 2011. 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-55883

Admin. suprême

2 octobre 2000

2 octobre 2000

{ page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt }     Resolution ResDH(2000)112 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 21 March

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-155241

Admin. suprême

19 mai 2015

19 mai 2015

On 2 March 2007 the first-instance court awarded the claim.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-248642

Admin. suprême

19 décembre 2025

19 décembre 2025

On 22 March 2011, following disciplinary proceedings against the applicant, she permanently lost the right to practice as a bailiff. She received that decision on 5 April 2011.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-55903

Admin. suprême

18 décembre 2000

18 décembre 2000

{ page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt }     Resolution ResDH(2000)139 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 28 March

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0120DEC004224417

Admin. suprême

20 janvier 2022

20 janvier 2022

In March 2021 the new developments occurred at the national level. On 9   March 2021 the applicant withdrew his civil claim within the framework of the criminal case against Mr P.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-250472

Admin. suprême

6 mai 2026

6 mai 2026

On 28 March 2016 the applicant was involved in the traffic accident for which, according to the findings issued on the same day by the traffic police, he was held responsible.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-141748

Admin. suprême

13 février 2014

13 février 2014

On 27 and 28 March 2008 the applicant was further examined in Ohrid Hospital.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0108DEC000260006

Admin. suprême

8 janvier 2013

8 janvier 2013

    On 4 March 2004 the applicant was once again examined by a forensic doctor, who noted that there were no injuries other than those observed in the medical report of 3 March 2004. 9.

Source officielle