AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1016DEC001078110
16 octobre 2012
16 octobre 2012
and for that purpose may provide for the establishment for the colony of such authorities as She thinks expedient and may empower such of them as may be specified in the Order to make laws either generally
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1002DEC002137904
2 octobre 2007
2 octobre 2007
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0902DEC004142105
2 septembre 2008
2 septembre 2008
It does not require merely that applications should be made to the appropriate domestic courts and that use should be made of remedies designed to challenge decisions already given.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-161568
23 février 2016
23 février 2016
I applied to the Mayor many times when my grandchild was near death.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-173250
30 mars 2017
30 mars 2017
The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. A.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1216JUD003977807
16 décembre 2010
16 décembre 2010
On 13 May 2007 the applicant lodged a constitutional complaint. 9.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1021DEC003698697
21 octobre 1998
21 octobre 1998
In the course of the hearing of 29 June 1995, the defence stated before the Court of Appeal that the case-files, as made available to the defence, were never complete and that many times
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1122JUD001917891
22 novembre 1995
22 novembre 1995
Section 174 (2) TCPA provides that an appeal against an enforcement notice may be made to the Secretary of State on any of the following grounds: "(a) that planning permission ought to be
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0303DEC001697005
3 mars 2009
3 mars 2009
ÚS 176/03 and many others).
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:1213DEC001313487
13 décembre 1990
13 décembre 1990
Many independent schools could not operate without such tax relief.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-203736
20 juin 2020
20 juin 2020
COMPLAINTS The applicants complain under Article 8 of the Convention that the Polish legal system does not allow them to marry or otherwise recognise their relationship.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-183509
9 mai 2018
9 mai 2018
font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; list-style-position:inside } .s13783063 { width:6.24pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s3537C2D6 { font-weight:normal } Communicated on 9 May
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-245410
16 septembre 2025
16 septembre 2025
The applicant is a coordinator of an anti-plagiarism initiative that has exposed cases of academic dishonesty in works of many high-ranking officials.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0919DEC006629713
19 septembre 2017
19 septembre 2017
Three months later S. wanted to marry the applicant, but she did not agree.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1018DEC001515403
18 octobre 2005
18 octobre 2005
– if need be and on the application made by the [relevant] prosecutor – prolong detention for a period [or periods] which as a whole may not exceed 12 months. 3.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0908DEC002836995
8 septembre 1997
8 septembre 1997
A request for such letters may be made by the child's mother or, after her death, by the child itself.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0313JUD001658710
13 mars 2014
13 mars 2014
However, as it has held on many occasions, this rule is subject to exceptions, which may be justified by the particular circumstances of each case (see Baumann v. France , no.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0614JUD002049192
14 juin 2001
14 juin 2001
France , no. 31070/96, § 64, 23 May 2000, unreported). 58.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0925JUD000064908
25 septembre 2012
25 septembre 2012
from the Moroccan authorities; - statements made by individuals interviewed in France; - statements made by the applicant, from which it transpired that he had participated in GICM meetings in Europe;
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0516JUD006348111
16 mai 2019
16 mai 2019
#xa0; This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
Source officiellePage 35 sur 4434