silent and to hire a lawyer, he had been afraid of the police officers who had brought him before the investigating judge, given that they had been the same police officers who had beaten him.

When she had learned from the applicant’s mother that the applicant had eye tics, she had talked to Ms K. and Ms P., who had affirmed that the applicant had had nervous tics before 7 November 2005.

Later his other son, Mr Sh., had also left the Chechen Republic. He had also stated that he had not known of Mr   Z.

The aspects of the case which the Audiencia had had to analyse in order to determine the applicant’s guilt had been predominantly points of law: the judgment had stated quite clearly that it was not for

The Court had to determine whether the criminal conviction had been “necessary in a democratic society”.

The Court proceeded on the basis that the applicant had been in a relevantly similar situation with pupils in his school who had had no impairments causing them behavioural difficulties and had been treated

The applicant’s stepfather had picked her up. When she had got home her mother had noticed that something had happened and asked the applicant, who had shown her the injuries.

D. had recognised Astrit because they had met on another occasion some months before when the same woman had also been present. He knew that Astrit and the woman had had an affair.

months because the applicants had either recovered from Covid-19 infection, had been vaccinated, had been transferred permanently or their contracts had come to an end.

The applicant had made that statement when he had been the State President, and it had been widely distributed by various media outlets.

Although the ensuing investigation had not identified the officer who had fired the smoke bomb, the fact remained that the Audiencia Provincial had found that the police had committed an offence of assault

As regards the scope of the interference, the applicant had not disputed that the e-book which had been available on his website had constituted prohibited material.

Regard should also be had to the fact that the authorities had not been informed of the actual nature of the event which had finally taken place.

The applicants had contended that they had been Polish Jews whose family members had been killed in the Holocaust and that that heritage had been extremely important to them.

The applicants further alleged that the security forces had returned to their village later that year, when they had burned other houses and destroyed harvested crops, and that they had returned once again

the only elements that had been taken into account for establishing that the latter had been members of ETA.

The Kuchis/Taliban had also shot at the other youngsters and had seen in which direction they had fled. They had subsequently asked the village elders who these youngsters were. 5.

the only elements that had been taken into account for establishing that the latter had been members of ETA.