in equivalent delays in the criminal proceedings.

Thus, a delay between March 1994 and September 1994 appears to be attributable to the defendants, and a delay of further eight months to the applicant.

The accompanying letter did not contain any explanation for the delay. 10.

However, even prior to the institution of the vetting process, the Supreme Court had accumulated delays and a significant backlog of cases.

#Regulation (EC) No 1371/2007 — Rail passengers’ rights and obligations — Article 17 — Compensation in the event of a delay — Excluded in the event of force majeure — Whether permissible — First subparagraph

There are no detailed submissions on the availability of damages for delay already suffered or on the possibility of such an action being preventative of further delay ( Kudła v.

, again delaying the confiscation hearing; a two-year delay between the confiscation order being made and the subsequent appeal being heard; and that fault for the delays identified was wholly attributable

    The omission, or significant delay, of the Court of Appeal’s decision could not be justified.

Violation of Art. 5-1-c as regards the remainder of provisional detention;No violation of Art. 5-1-c as regards the delay in releasing the applicant;Violation of Art. 5-4;Violation of Art. 5-5;Non-pecuniary

54Z) MISE A DISPOSITION AU GREFFE LE 02 AVRIL 2026 DÉCISION : CONTRADICTOIRE DEMANDEUR : Monsieur [J] [F], né le 09 Avril 2001 à [Localité 1], demeurant [Adresse 1] Représenté par Me Christian DELPY

.-92100 BOULOGNE BILLANCOURT représenté par Me Vincent CHATRAS de la SCP CHATRAS-DELPY & ASSOCIES, avocat au barreau de CORREZE Madame Marie-Louise Edith X...

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay

. # Carriage by air - Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 - Articles 5, 6 and 7 -Compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights - Validity

The applicants complained that the Government had submitted only part of the evidence necessary for the examination of the application, and even that had been done with a significant delay.

MAURIN-[O], demeurant [Adresse 1] INTIMEE Comparante en la personne de Maître [N] [O] L'affaire a été plaidée à l'audience du 10 mars 2022 devant Madame Nathalie DELPEY-CORBAUX, première

Adresse 1] APPELANTE Comparante ET : Maître [K] [V], demeurant [Adresse 2] INTIMÉE Comparante L'affaire a été plaidée à l'audience du 06 octobre 2022 devant Nathalie DELPEY-CORBAUX

In this case, even if the applicant could be considered to be responsible for some of the delays, this could not justify the length of the periods in between individual hearings and certainly not the total

the Committee of Ministers, in the above-mentioned interim resolution, insisted on Turkey’s obligation under Article 53 of the Convention to abide by the judgment of the Court and to erase, without delay

D..., André, Jean Delaye, demeurant ..., 5°/ de M.