Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-113098
10 janvier 2008
10 janvier 2008
As emerges from the content of your letter mentioned above, your client is not considered as displaced because her father is not a displaced person.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0206DEC006933301
6 février 2003
6 février 2003
On 24 September 1984 the Ministry rejected his application and returned his documents because the applicant was a Jehovah’s Witness.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0204DEC002851905
4 février 2010
4 février 2010
This request was rejected by the Constitutional Court on 9 October 1991, because the applicant could have asked for review of the planning scheme in building proceedings concerning the land at issue.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0528JUD001209804
28 mai 2009
28 mai 2009
No hearings were fixed between September 2000 and 17 October 2000 because the case file had been sent to the St.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-169584
17 novembre 2016
17 novembre 2016
Background to the case In 1999, immediately after birth, the second applicant was placed in a State institution because of her biological mother’s poor living conditions.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0210DEC001644590
10 février 1993
10 février 1993
Because the proceedings were "non-contentious" (Außerstreitverfahren), and because there had not been a hearing on appeal, the applicant only became aware of the names of the judges on 9 February
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0220DEC006506716
20 février 2024
20 février 2024
not deactivated the main switch, this had not contributed to the death because the kneader had not come into operation and the girl had sustained lethal injuries because of the fall (see paragraph
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-146056
11 juillet 2014
11 juillet 2014
He submits that because he had no personal assistant he could not benefit from daily walks and was dependent on the other inmates to be moved around the prison.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-195093
9 juillet 2019
9 juillet 2019
17 November 2018 and 29 January 2019 respectively SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASES Application no. 58112/18 The applicant was convicted under Article 20.2 § 1 of the Code of Administrative Offences (CAO) because
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-218151
30 mai 2022
30 mai 2022
that the right to have the costs in question reimbursed had stemmed from her health insurance and the corresponding obligation of the Institute to reimburse such costs had not ceased to exist just because
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3061
9 novembre 2006
9 novembre 2006
for her private life, but also because the published documents had been protected by the confidentiality of the parliamentary inquiry.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-229225
2 novembre 2023
2 novembre 2023
On 29 March 2016 the Chișinău Court of Appeal quashed the search warrant for the applicant organisation’s headquarters, finding the search unlawful because the religious cult had no procedural standing
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-9541
25 mars 2014
25 mars 2014
Altercations took place outside the first hearing because of the intensive media coverage of the case. At the December 2013 hearing the judges stood down.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-166723
24 août 2016
24 août 2016
He was cross-examined by the defence with regard to his competence to give characterisation of the injuries, because he was a traumatology expert.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-1657
24 février 2009
24 février 2009
Civil rights and obligations Appeal by local environmental protection association not in nature of an actio popularis : article 6 applicable Access to court Ruling that appeal was inadmissible because
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-242806
17 mars 2025
17 mars 2025
The applicant’s application was accompanied by the following declaration signed by the applicant: “I am not submitting any recommendation issued by a parish priest, because I am a non-believer”.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0514DEC005913016
14 mai 2019
14 mai 2019
It did not award any compensation for non-pecuniary damage because the applicant had failed to make such a claim in his constitutional appeal. 8.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0914DEC004785199
14 septembre 2000
14 septembre 2000
The hearing of 6 October 1993 was cancelled because of the elections. A new hearing was fixed for 26 January 1994 but was again adjourned until 18 May 1994.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-7378
10 janvier 2013
10 janvier 2013
The support provided to persons detained in prison psychiatric wings was inadequate and placing them in facilities outside prison often proved impossible either because of the shortage of places in psychiatric
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-249595
12 mars 2026
12 mars 2026
The 30-year-old applicant has been placed under guardianship fully limiting his capacity to act because of his mild intellectual disability.
Source officiellePage 35 sur 1499