Grèce (n° 2) (requête n o 16163/02)   Satisfaction équitable Les sept requérants, Maria Nastou, Alexandra Nastou, Styliani Al. Nastou, Constantina Al. Nastou, Heleni Nastou, Styliani I.

    On 23 April 1970 the District Court found that the applicant was Z.’s father and ordered him to contribute to her maintenance. 10.

  Alexandru Marius Radu v.

the European Commission of Human Rights under former Article 25 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by two Romanian nationals, Mr   Alexandru

Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Elisabeth Steiner, President,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos

of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 26   March 2013 as a Chamber composed of:   Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre, President,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Linos-Alexandre

Estonie (n os 14659/04 et 16855/04) Les requérants sont Alexandre Dorojko, apatride né en 1960, et Vyatcheslav Pojarski, ressortissant estonien né en 1981.

These statements by [police officer M.] were corroborated by the head of the Bezhitskiy District police station.

The court noted as follows: “The [District] Court’s conclusion [concerning the polygraph testing] is erroneous.

    The applicant challenged that refusal before the Basmanniy District Court of Moscow.

, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Elisabeth Steiner, President,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque,   Linos-Alexandre

    On 4 April 2008 the Criminal Court of Appeal upheld the decision of the District Court.

Inter ‑ District Prosecutor’s Office (“the prosecutor’s office”) and reported the abduction of their four relatives by military servicemen.

    On 2 February 2006 the District Prosecutor’s Office decided to resume the investigation and informed the applicant accordingly. 20.

    the return of the case file to the public prosecutor’s office at the Focşani District Court in order to execute [the present order]. ” 18.

    On 19 November 2007 Sverdlovskiy District Court of Belgorod (“the District Court”) decided to remand the applicant in custody. The court held as follows: “...

    The applicant was appointed to the office of judge at the Wodzisław Śląski District Court on 16 December 2003. 6.

    On 19 December 2016 the complaint was dismissed as inadmissible by the preliminary chamber judge at the Reșița District Court.

The final decision of the Vâlcea District Court of 4 September 1997 upheld those findings. 12 .