Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Life;Article 2-2 - Use of force) (Substantive aspect

He referred to Articles 2 § 1 and 6 § 1 of the Convention, which read insofar as relevant as follows: Article 2 § 1 “1.     Everyone’s right to life shall be protected by law...”

Elle invoque les articles 2 et 3 de la Convention, ainsi libellés   : Article 2 «   1.     Le droit de toute personne à la vie est protégé par la loi.

Ils invoquent l’article 2 de la Convention combiné avec son article   14.

Royaume-Uni - 32457/04 Arrêt 27.11.2007 [Section IV] Article 2 Obligations positives Manque d'indépendance des policiers chargés d'enquêter sur des allégations de collusion des forces de l'ordre quant

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 2 OF THE CONVENTION 15.

Turquie - 9207/03 Arrêt 4.11.2008 [Section II] Article 2 Article 2-2 Recours à la force Blessure grave due à une balle perdue provenant de l'arme à feu d'un policier utilisée au cours d'une opération de

Relying on Article 13 of the Convention, they complained of a lack of an effective remedy in respect of their Article 2 procedural complaint. 4.

    Declares the complaint concerning Article 2 of the Convention admissible;   2.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 2 OF THE CONVENTION 27.

THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLEs 2 AND 3 OF THE CONVENTION 22.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 2 OF THE CONVENTION 27.

  » Article 8 «   (...) 2.

Bulgaria - 31434/15 Judgment 21.7.2020 [Section IV] Article 2 Article 2-1 Effective investigation Ineffective judicial system, given the impossibility for the brother of a murder victim to claim compensation

THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 2 OF THE CONVENTION 7.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 2 IN RESPECT OF DELAY, ALONE AND IN CONJUNCTION WITH ARTICLE 13 OF THE CONVENTION 79.

  STRASBOURG 7 December 2023   FINAL   07/03/2024   This judgment has become final under Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.

THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 2 OF THE CONVENTION 22.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 2 OF THE CONVENTION 29.