The applicants complained of a breach of their right to freedom of expression under Article 10 of the Convention. 2 .

Georgia - 2591/19 Judgment 22.7.2021 [Section V] Article 10 Article 10-1 Freedom of expression Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons to justify fine, forced product recall and ban on future use of condom

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 10 OF THE CONVENTION 13.

THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 10 OF THE CONVENTION 21.

The relevant provisions read as follows: Article 10 “1.     Everyone has the right to freedom of expression.

    The case concerns the defamation proceedings against the applicant and raises an issue under Article 10 of the Convention. 2.

THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 10 OF THE CONVENTION 16.

THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 10 OF THE CONVENTION 21.

THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 10 OF THE CONVENTION 9.

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 10 OF THE CONVENTION 22.     The applicants alleged a violation of Article 10 of the Convention which reads as follows: “1.

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 10 OF THE CONVENTION 7.

THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 10 OF THE CONVENTION 14.

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 10 OF THE CONVENTION 29.

    There has accordingly been a violation of Article 10 of the Convention. II.     APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 39.

, contrary to Article   10 of the Convention.

    These applications concern civil defamation proceedings brought by public figures against the applicants, who complain under Article 10 of the Convention.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 10 OF THE CONVENTION 46.

or rights of others”, within the meaning of Article 10 § 2.

  » EN DROIT SUR LA VIOLATION ALLÉGUÉE DE L’ARTICLE   10 DE LA CONVENTION 16.