In a response given to the applicant on 28   August 2007 the Prisons Administration noted that there was nothing in the applicant’s case file that would indicate that the applicant had

The Court considers, therefore that the Government have not shown that an effective remedy was available in theory and in practice at the relevant time.

    If the court considers that the complaint is justified, it shall find that there was an unreasonable delay in the impugned proceedings. 3.

The court found it undisputed that the applicant had been injured, but stated that there was no evidence that the injuries had been inflicted as a result of police brutality.

the remedies were effective and available in theory and in practice at the relevant time, that is to say that they were accessible, were capable of providing redress in respect of the applicant’s complaints

    The Court reiterates that applicants are only obliged to exhaust domestic remedies which are available in theory and in practice at the relevant time and which they can directly institute

They state that there is no suggestion that any remedy is available to them which could lead to the identification and punishment of those responsible.

Geodis freight & logistics (‘société Thales Geodis').

    The applicant alleged that in the event of his extradition or administrative removal to Uzbekistan he risked being subjected to torture and ill-treatment, that there was no effective remedy

, conseiller référendaire rapporteur, Mme Auroy, conseiller doyen, Mme Berthomier, greffier de chambre ; Vu les observations écrites de la SCP Fabiani, Luc-Thaler et Pinatel, avocat de M. et Mme P...,

Sur le rapport de Mme Feydeau-Thieffry, conseiller référendaire rapporteur, les observations écrites de la SCP Fabiani, Luc-Thaler et Pinatel, avocat de Mme A..., après débats en l'audience publique du

Sur le rapport de Mme Feydeau-Thieffry, conseiller référendaire, les observations de la SCP Fabiani, Luc-Thaler et Pinatel, avocat du préfet des Yvelines, et l'avis de Mme Marilly, avocat général référendaire

There was no evidence to indicate that the boy had been the victim of violence, despite the attempts to examine the numerous versions put forward by his parents.

that they had had ulterior motives.

They also submitted that they had taken into account the possibility of requesting confidentiality under Rule   33 of the Rules of Court, but noted that the Court provided no guarantees that once

    The Government contended that the applicant had had effective channels of complaint on the same basis that they had argued that the applicant had not exhausted domestic remedies in respect

The Supreme Court emphasised that that process should be swifter than an ordinary procedure, so as to ensure the protection of the applicant’s rights.

    They further considered that there had been no particular social need for the requisition order in favour of D.L.

In their submissions under Article 13 (see below), which in the Court’s view are equally pertinent to their objection of non-exhaustion, they further specified that there had been an effective remedy against