A C, représenté par Me Pochard, demande au juge des référés : 1°) d'ordonner, sur le fondement des dispositions de l'article L. 521-1 du code de justice administrative, la suspension de l'exécution

Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête, enregistrée le 14 mars 2024, Mme A B, représentée par Me Pochard, demande au juge des référés : 1°) d'ordonner, sur le fondement des dispositions de l'article

Par une requête, enregistrée sous le n° 2300021 le 4 janvier 2023, Mme C B épouse A, représentée par Me Pochard, demande au juge des référés : 1°) d'enjoindre, sur le fondement des dispositions de l'article

siège social est sis [Adresse 5] représentée par Maître Frédéric PIRAS de la SELARL PVBF, avocats au barreau de LYON D’AUTRE PART COMPOSITION DU TRIBUNAL LORS DES DÉBATS ET DU DÉLIBÉRÉ: Jocelyne POYARD

MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the imposition since 28 March 2017 and ongoing of the “dangerous detainee” regime with regard to the applicant in various detention centres and prisons in Poland

they would not be removed from Poland. 8.

that they would not be removed from Poland. 6.

Around February 2017 the applicant learnt that his partner was planning to stay in Poland indefinitely with the couple’s daughter.

On 21   July 2022 the applicant, who is an Egyptian national, travelled to Poland without a visa. On 21   July 2022 he was arrested by the Polish authorities.

  Poland , no. 14322/12, §§ 41-50, 15 September 2015, and Dejnek v.   Poland , no. 9635/13, §§ 70-77, 1 June 2017; compare also Bojar v.   Poland [Committee], no.

Poland , no. 41029/06, 22 June 2010; Kącki v. Poland , no.   10947/11, 4 July 2017; Brzeziński v. Poland , no.   47542/07, 25 July 2019; and Banaszczyk v.

In April 2017 they had intended to apply for asylum in Poland for the first time.

Poland , no. 61444/00, §§ 34-46, ECHR   2005-V.

B. against Poland and T.K. and S.B. against Poland lodged on 4 November 2015 and 4 November 2015 respectively STATEMENT OF FACTS The applicant in the first case, Mr A.B.

Poland no. 59519/00, §§ 38-65, 22 March 2007; Siałkowska v.   Poland no. 8932/05, §§ 20-47, 22 March 2007; Smyk v.   Poland no.   8958/04, §§ 16-42, 28 July 2009; Bąkowska v.

Poland 01/01/2023 Radosław ZIMER 1978 Kamińsk Polish   2. 10121/23 Jaworski v.   Poland 27/12/2022 Marcin JAWORSKI 1984 Krzywaniec Polish   3. 12915/23 Bodzanowski v.

  Poland (no.

Poland , cited above, §   177). 41.

Sobiech, a lawyer practising in Warsaw, Poland. The Polish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr K. Drzewicki, of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 3.