religion d'Etat ; qu'un tel mariage est donc une cérémonie à caractère essentiellement privé ; que s'agissant d'un mariage religieux, la place d'un des mariés dans l'ordre de succession au trône est sans

:133.42pt; display:inline-block } .sA3D40E95 { width:52.56pt; display:inline-block } .sA8847899 { width:93.07pt; display:inline-block }     FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 26022/20 Maria

against Austria   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 7   November 2023 as a Committee composed of:   Tim Eicke, President ,   Branko Lubarda,   Ana Maria

font grief aux arrêts d'avoir dit la société Accor et Cie employeur conjoint de M.

The Government did not comment on this point.

page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 22 May 2023   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 40685/22 Ana-Maria

He is represented before the Court by Ms Maria Guzman, a lawyer practising in Askim, Sweden.

#0d0d0d } .sA85548BA { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic; color:#0d0d0d } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 6 January 2025   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 15233/24 Maria

    The applicant, Ms Mária Šidlovská, is a Slovak national, who was born in 1969 and lives in Banská Bystrica.

In particular, did the deprivation of the applicants’ property impose an excessive individual burden on them on account of the amount of expropriation compensation awarded (see Scordino v.

Elósegui , President ,   Andreas Zünd,   Mykola Gnatovskyy , judges , and Martina Keller, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to: the application (no.

Par des mémoires en demande, enregistrés les 25 février 2021, 13 et 16 mai 2022, Mmes E et Laurence C, représentées par Me Maria, s'associent au recours formé par la SAS Port Inland et la SARL Société

their title deeds were not disputed, they were not able to recover possession of their properties, as the latter had either already been sold or were sold by the State to third parties, and that they did

to it; they therefore did not do so.

;        Application No. 25696/94                       by Maria

    Moreover, the applicant company did not allege that the national law did not allow it to request due compensation for eventual damages suffered because of the delayed enforcement, separately

However, the authorities did not issue a formal expropriation order. 4.

Birzescu, Ms Maria Birzescu, Ms Anca Birzescu, Ms Maria Mihaela Birzescu Ilie and Mr Dumitru Birzescu (“the applicants”), on 16 February 2005. 2.

X..., quatre-vingt-dix pour Mme Y..., et dix pour son père, M. Y... ; qu'après le mariage de M.