On 30 March 2004 the Hämeenlinna District Court ( käräjäoikeus, tingsrätten ) convicted the applicant as charged, amending however the time of the commission of the offences, and sentenced him to a fine

On 28 March 1994 the Warsaw Regional Court held the first hearing in this case.

1988, 17 October 1988, 16 March 1989, 20 September 1989, 20   March 1990, 10 October 1990, 20 February 1991, 24 September 1991, 11 February 1992, 8 September 1992, 28 January 1993, 18 May 1993, 12

In a judgment of 12 March 2008 the Zürich Social Insurance Court dismissed the applicant’s claim, finding that the settlement covered the claim in these proceedings and therefore had become res iudicata

Russia , nos. 66215/12 and   4   others, § 17, 10 July 2018), the Court considers that the finding of a violation constitutes sufficient just satisfaction in the present case.

The detention on remand was extended on 18 March 2011. On 28 June 2011 the Łódź Regional Court extended the applicant’s pre-trial detention.

Finding in the claimants’ favour, it declared that they were the rightful heirs to their great-grandmother’s estate and ordered the applicants to hand over the property in question.

  24240/07, 20 March 2012).

It relied on the same arguments set out by the Plenary Supreme Court in its judgment of 11 March 2002.

Between 18 March 1991 and 6 December 1991, the bailiff made 3   attempts to recover possession, on 18 March 1991, 2 July 1991 and 6   December 1991.

    On 21 March 1990, the applicant served notice on the tenant requiring him to vacate the premises.

In particular, on 16 March 2007 the measure of restraint was prolonged until 4 April 2007. 11 .     On 21 March 2007 the applicant was committed to stand trial before the Regional Court.

He was diagnosed as suffering from Wernicke-Korsakoff Syndrome in March 2003 and his sentence was suspended as a result.

On 14 March 2017 the applicant notified the Moscow Government about his intention to organise and hold a march and a gathering in the centre of Moscow on 26 March 2017.

    On 10 March 1997 the District Court revoked the arrest warrant. 10.

    In March 2010, the applicant applied for asylum in the Netherlands. 9.

On 3 December 2012 the Sabail District Court upheld the applicant’s claims in part, finding that the failure of Company A.

  53567/07, 13   March 2018; Canşad and Others v. Turkey , no. 7851/05, 13 March 2018; İzzet Çelik v. Turkey , no. 15185/05, 23 January 2018; and Bayram Koç v.

by law and contained clear findings.