In April 1996 the applicant was arrested while receiving a sum of money from partners of SIGO.

Consequently, he could not vote in the general elections held in Hungary on 11 April 2010. THE LAW 7.

A hearing was held on 3   April   2012.

    At the time of the events in question the applicant was held in detention on remand in Valmiera Prison.

    On 16 October 2001 the Town Court held a hearing in the applicant’s case.

When he regained consciousness, he found himself lying outside the room with his head bleeding. 7.

However, the Government found the sum claimed by the applicant excessive. In their view, the amount to be awarded should not exceed EUR   1,500. 32.

The draft put forward by four other unions was approved by a general meeting of staff held on 20 November 2002. On 28 May 2003 the company entered into a collective agreement with four unions.

The Court held, by 15 votes to two, that there had been a violation of Article   1 of Protocol No.

The applicant punched M.P. in the head several times and proceeded to kick and punch her about the body in the presence of their minor children.

In a judgment of 29 July 2004 (see press release no. 387 of 2004) the Court held that there had been no violation of Article 8 or Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.

On 29 March 2004 the Bursa Administrative Court held that there was no causal link between the administration’s act and the applicant’s alleged moral suffering.

The first document showed that the applicant required permanent supervision by a neurologist and regular MRI scans of the head.

Furthermore, the obligations to herd reindeer belonging to others had allegedly no basis in law. 8.

The rapidity of the deterioration which she would suffer and the extent to which she would be able to obtain access to medical treatment, support and care, including help from relatives, involved a certain

Accordingly, Article 6 §   1 is applicable under its civil head. 31.

    A preliminary hearing was held on 15 February 2007 and hearings on the merits were held from 22 February to 20 April 2007.

that there had been a violation of Article 1, of Protocol   No   1, in respect of the applicant monasteries not parties to the agreement of 11   May   1988;   – held that there

Mironov was held in facility IZ-50/9, in particular, between 27   May and 27 September 2002 in cell no. 3.