CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1969:0204DEC000324567
4 février 1969
Recently the Supreme Court has admitted that damages can be claimed in such cases where there has been fault on the part of the officials concerned.
Page 34 sur 118
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0420JUD004757999
20 avril 2006
Damage 55. The applicant claimed 30,000 euros (EUR) in non-pecuniary damages for the distress he had suffered as a result of the violation of his freedom of expression.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1117DEC003586111
17 novembre 2020
The Government submitted that the applicant had lost her victim status on account of the outcome of the civil proceedings for damages.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-193663
17 mai 2019
She also sought to prevent further damage to the property of the club.
ECLI:CEDH:001-192528
18 mars 2019
It upheld the High Court’s findings on liability, but reduced the award of damages to EUR 325,000.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0720JUD004794099
20 juillet 2004
Section 349 of the Civil Code provides: “(1) Liability for damage caused by the State administration shall only be established if damage could not be prevented by means of ordinary legal remedies or if
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0520JUD000227803
20 mai 2010
The relevant provision of the Code provides: Article 1167 Grounds of Responsibility for Non-Pecuniary Damage “...2.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1214JUD007483201
14 décembre 2010
The applicant and her daughter's claims for damages 48. On 28 May 2001 the applicant, through her lawyer, filed an action for damages to the Bratislava III District Court.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1102JUD001971002
2 novembre 2006
Anybody who, due to defamation, suffered a damage or loss of profit, may claim for compensation. 2.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0319DEC002917906
19 mars 2013
Following the 2004 Amendment, Article 417 1 § 2 reads in so far as relevant: “Where damage has been caused by the delivery of a final ruling or a final decision, redress for such damage may
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0723JUD005535212
23 juillet 2013
They noted that the applicant could have instituted a civil action for damages (in tort), which could have made good any damage or loss sustained as a result of her detention conditions if she had been
ECLI:CEDH:001-117526
19 février 2013
On 15 March 2010 Dr Ratnayake, a consultant psychiatrist, examined the applicant and concluded that her needs could be met at Yarl’s Wood as she would be under constant observation there.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1006DEC003003816
6 octobre 2022
name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for pecuniary and non ‑ pecuniary damage
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0408JUD003858504
8 avril 2010
Damage 1. Pecuniary damage (a) The parties' submissions 48.
ECLI:CEDH:001-234742
3 juin 2024
In the fresh proceedings, the Constanţa Court of Appeal partly granted the applicant’s claim and ordered the Mangalia local authorities to pay the applicant non-pecuniary damages in amount of 3,000 RON
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0602DEC002035912
2 juin 2016
Applicant name Date of birth Representative name and location Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0925JUD005279299
25 septembre 2003
as to criminal trials, and hear appeals against decisions made by the Chief Constables as to instigation of criminal proceedings.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0730JUD000448704
30 juillet 2009
It granted her claim in the part relating to compensation for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage. 31.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0121JUD004577199
21 janvier 2003
As they had caused considerable damage, they fell to be considered under paragraph 7 of that Article.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0410JUD001994604
10 avril 2012
Damage 58.