CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

2 348 résultats pour « Constance DAMAMME »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1969:0204DEC000324567

Admin. suprême

4 février 1969

4 février 1969

Recently the Supreme Court has admitted that damages can be claimed in such cases where there has been fault on the part of the officials concerned.

Page 34 sur 118

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0420JUD004757999

Admin. suprême

20 avril 2006

20 avril 2006

    Damage 55.     The applicant claimed 30,000 euros (EUR) in non-pecuniary damages for the distress he had suffered as a result of the violation of his freedom of expression.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1117DEC003586111

Admin. suprême

17 novembre 2020

17 novembre 2020

    The Government submitted that the applicant had lost her victim status on account of the outcome of the civil proceedings for damages.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-193663

Admin. suprême

17 mai 2019

17 mai 2019

She also sought to prevent further damage to the property of the club.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-192528

Admin. suprême

18 mars 2019

18 mars 2019

It upheld the High Court’s findings on liability, but reduced the award of damages to EUR 325,000.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0720JUD004794099

Admin. suprême

20 juillet 2004

20 juillet 2004

Section 349 of the Civil Code provides: “(1) Liability for damage caused by the State administration shall only be established if damage could not be prevented by means of ordinary legal remedies or if

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0520JUD000227803

Admin. suprême

20 mai 2010

20 mai 2010

    The relevant provision of the Code provides: Article 1167 Grounds of Responsibility for Non-Pecuniary Damage “...2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1214JUD007483201

Admin. suprême

14 décembre 2010

14 décembre 2010

The applicant and her daughter's claims for damages 48.     On 28 May 2001 the applicant, through her lawyer, filed an action for damages to the Bratislava III District Court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1102JUD001971002

Admin. suprême

2 novembre 2006

2 novembre 2006

    Anybody who, due to defamation, suffered a damage or loss of profit, may claim for compensation. 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0319DEC002917906

Admin. suprême

19 mars 2013

19 mars 2013

    Following the 2004 Amendment, Article 417 1 § 2 reads in so far as relevant: “Where damage has been caused by the delivery of a final ruling or a final decision, redress for such damage may

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0723JUD005535212

Admin. suprême

23 juillet 2013

23 juillet 2013

They noted that the applicant could have instituted a civil action for damages (in tort), which could have made good any damage or loss sustained as a result of her detention conditions if she had been

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-117526

Admin. suprême

19 février 2013

19 février 2013

On 15 March 2010 Dr Ratnayake, a consultant psychiatrist, examined the applicant and concluded that her needs could be met at Yarl’s Wood as she would be under constant observation there.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1006DEC003003816

Admin. suprême

6 octobre 2022

6 octobre 2022

name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for pecuniary and non ‑ pecuniary damage

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0408JUD003858504

Admin. suprême

8 avril 2010

8 avril 2010

    Damage 1. Pecuniary damage (a) The parties' submissions 48.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-234742

Admin. suprême

3 juin 2024

3 juin 2024

In the fresh proceedings, the Constanţa Court of Appeal partly granted the applicant’s claim and ordered the Mangalia local authorities to pay the applicant non-pecuniary damages in amount of 3,000 RON

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0602DEC002035912

Admin. suprême

2 juin 2016

2 juin 2016

Applicant name Date of birth   Representative name and location Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0925JUD005279299

Admin. suprême

25 septembre 2003

25 septembre 2003

as to criminal trials, and hear appeals against decisions made by the Chief Constables as to instigation of criminal proceedings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0730JUD000448704

Admin. suprême

30 juillet 2009

30 juillet 2009

It granted her claim in the part relating to compensation for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage. 31.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0121JUD004577199

Admin. suprême

21 janvier 2003

21 janvier 2003

As they had caused considerable damage, they fell to be considered under paragraph 7 of that Article.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0410JUD001994604

Admin. suprême

10 avril 2012

10 avril 2012

    Damage 58.

Source officielle