CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

29 963 résultats pour « Bechaud »

Tous
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
CC
CE
TA
CAA
CA
CPH
TJ
TCOM
CJUE
Prud'h.
Conv. coll.
BOFIP
IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-147132

Admin. suprême

16 septembre 2014

16 septembre 2014

Invoking Article 2 of the Convention the applicant complains that his right to life had been breached because during his detention he had not received the required medical treatment for his HIV condition

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-50713

Admin. suprême

28 janvier 1997

28 janvier 1997

Protocol No. 1 as regards on the one hand the legislative suspension of the execution of the expulsion decision and on the other the applicant's inability to obtain the assistance of the authorities because

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-215655

Admin. suprême

20 janvier 2022

20 janvier 2022

In November 2017 he requested, among other things, that the sum be reduced because his net income had decreased since July 2017. He also had three more children to support.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-202129

Admin. suprême

4 mars 2020

4 mars 2020

He has thus been discriminated against vis-à-vis other foreign nationals because Somali nationals cannot in any circumstances receive work-based residence permits as their passports are not, as a rule,

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-229298

Admin. suprême

7 novembre 2023

7 novembre 2023

On appeal, the second instance court reversed the costs order, imposing on the applicant the obligation to reimburse the respondents’ costs of proceedings in the amount of some EUR 415 plus interest because

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0118DEC000444121

Admin. suprême

18 janvier 2024

18 janvier 2024

On 11 May 2023 the registered mail sent to the applicant was returned to the Registry, containing the prison’s representative note that the delivery of the mail had been impossible because the addressee

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-248742

Admin. suprême

23 janvier 2026

23 janvier 2026

On 20 May 2024, the applicant requested that that prohibition be lifted, inter alia since his partner and children had moved to Spain because of the mediatisation of his criminal case.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-203655

Admin. suprême

18 juin 2020

18 juin 2020

However, he argued that restoring the old house was impossible, in particular because it had been in a decrepit state and dangerous to the surroundings, and also because it was unclear whether the authentic

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-225730

Admin. suprême

8 juin 2023

8 juin 2023

During his years of study, the applicant did not undergo the compulsory flight training on MI-2 and MI-8 helicopters because of the institution’s lack of funds.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-159421

Admin. suprême

25 novembre 2015

25 novembre 2015

On the other hand, the appellate court adhered to the lower court’s decision that the child should continue living with the father because that was in line with the child’s wishes and because Konin was

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1972:0321DEC000461870

Admin. suprême

21 mars 1972

21 mars 1972

Both courts accepted that the applicant had been persecuted because of his religion as well as his nationality.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0515DEC002700695

Admin. suprême

15 mai 1996

15 mai 1996

       Since the applicant was not in a position to pay the fees of a lawyer, he was prevented, because of its complexity, from pursuing properly his action for libel before a

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-167918

Admin. suprême

29 septembre 2016

29 septembre 2016

A.O. also submitted that in December 2011 she had left the United Kingdom because attempts to get back together with the applicant had failed and because she had felt threatened by the applicant’s aggressive

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0602DEC000833607

Admin. suprême

2 juin 2020

2 juin 2020

On 19   June 2003 the Treasury returned the writ to the applicant because the document did not specify the sum to be paid.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1217JUD001085603

Admin. suprême

17 décembre 2009

17 décembre 2009

The court refused that change because the applicant had failed to prove the impossibility of a literal enforcement.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0621JUD005618507

Admin. suprême

21 juin 2011

21 juin 2011

The questioning started some time after midnight because we were waiting for a defence lawyer.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0709JUD002367707

Admin. suprême

9 juillet 2009

9 juillet 2009

The parties were, however, not able to submit a copy of this decision because the case file had been lost.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1011DEC001206602

Admin. suprême

11 octobre 2005

11 octobre 2005

He requested the court to waive those fees because he had no sources of income and could not afford to pay.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1112DEC003739004

Admin. suprême

12 novembre 2009

12 novembre 2009

Hearings listed for 26   July and then 2 October 2001 were adjourned because the defendant again failed to attend.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0324DEC002372803

Admin. suprême

24 mars 2009

24 mars 2009

By a decision of 23 June 2003 the investigation was stayed because of the applicant's illness.

Source officielle

Page 34 sur 1499

← PrécédentSuivant →