sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Anatoly Kovler, President,   Nina Vajić,   Peer Lorenzen,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

DECISION Application no. 80237/13 Peter HARVEY against the United Kingdom The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 21   November 2017 as a Chamber composed of:   Linos-Alexandre

application (no. 22088/04) against Romania lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Romanian national, Mr Alexandru

  It originated in an application (no. 14726/89) against the Hellenic Republic lodged with the Commission under Article 25 (art. 25) by five Greek nationals, Mr Alexandros Kefalas, Mr Vassilios Kefalas

Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission”) under former Article 25 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a United Kingdom national, Mr Alexander

    The Government submitted that the applicants could have instituted a fresh set of constitutional redress proceedings to complain under Article   13 about the Constitutional Court judgment

40132/16) against the Slovak Republic lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Slovak national, Mr Alexander

  There appeared before the Court: (a)     for the Government Mr Francesco Crisafulli , Co-Agent,   (b)     for the applicants Mr Nicolò Paoletti , Counsel, Ms Alessandra

    On 18 February 2021, by order of the Public Prosecutor, the applicant was transferred to an accommodation facility in Alexandria to complete the Best Interests Assessment (BIA) conducted

the Kingdom of Spain lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Spanish national, Mr   Alejandro

The Court observes that these objections are identical to those raised in the case of Alexandrou v.

THE FACTS The first applicant, Mr Alessandro Giusto, and the second applicant, Ms   Maria Chiara Bornacin, are a married couple and are both Italian nationals.

against the Italian Republic lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by two Italian nationals, Mrs Alessandra

    They are represented before the Court by Mr Anton Giulio Lana and Mr   Andrea Saccucci, lawyers practising in Rome, and Mrs Alessandra Ballerinni and Mr Marco Vano, lawyers practising

Mr   Nicola Lettieri ,   co-Agent , Mr   Giuseppe Albenzio ,   Avvocato dello Stato ; –     for the applicants Mr   Nicolò Paoletti ,   Counsel , Ms   Alessandra

Freedoms (“the Convention”) by four Georgian nationals, Mr Sergo Gogitidze (“the first applicant”), Mr   Anzor Gogitidze (“the second applicant”), Mr Tengiz Gogitidze (“the third applicant”) and Mr Aleksandre

Relevant conduct : violation of duty to provide the public with prospectus in case of offer of stocks under Article 94 §1-2 of Legislative Decree no. 58/1998 with regard to operation “Fresh 2008” and other