The applicant alleged that her right to liberty under Article 5 of the Convention had been breached, because she had been detained from 7 April to 4 May 2011 without a court order, and that

He was released on licence on 7   September 2004 but his licence was revoked on 24 September that year because he failed to comply with the terms of the licence. 7.

    When the applicant regained consciousness, he had asked the police officers to call an ambulance because he did not feel well.

In her opinion the psychiatrist stated that the first applicant had left Bangladesh in 2010 partly because of a flood and partly because two political parties had been trying to recruit him.

According to the applicant, because he and his wife were unable to take care of the child due to the worsening of Ms O.R.’s mental health, they agreed to place the child temporarily in the care of Ms O.R

They also informed them that he could not be returned to Uzbekistan because the Court had applied Rule 39 in his case, which was pending before it.

He also alleged that the criminal proceedings had been unfair, because his conviction had been based solely on statements extracted under ill-treatment. 4.

    On an unspecified date Mr O.A. appealed against the district court judgment and sought the withdrawal of the applicant’s parental rights because she had allegedly organised an attempt on

Because he had never planned to stay in Hungary, but wanted to lodge an asylum application in Austria, he left the camp two or three days later and took a train to Vienna. 10.

R.Lj. claimed, however, that he had not personally participated in the killings, because he had panicked and had left the flat when he had heard fighting. 46.

    By a judgment of 27 February 2009, which became final on the same day, the Prague High Court acquitted the accused.

She stated that because of back-pain problems on 29 October 2012 she had visited her family doctor in L., but then she had been placed in hospital by subterfuge.

This is because there are specific provisions which clearly differentiate between a foetus and a stillborn child.

Last night I wet my bed because I dreamt that my father would come and take me away ...”

In other words, an unfettered power which might be arbitrarily or capriciously used did not become legal just because people generally did not take exception to its use. 35.

{ margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt }   Communicated on 29 January 2019   THIRD SECTION Application no. 38161/15 Daniel Alexander

Putter and Mr Johannes Alexandrov Putter, on 10   October 2002.

(c)     for the Romanian Government Ms Roxana Rizoiu, Agent (d)     for the applicants Mr Corneliu Dinu and Mr Alexandru Tănase, Counsel.

#xa0; The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 22   September 2020 as a Chamber composed of:   Krzysztof Wojtyczek, President,   Ksenija Turković,   Linos-Alexandre