CETAT16-02-05-01 COMMUNE - ORGANES DE LA COMMUNE - CONSEILLERS MUNICIPAUX - DEMISSION D'OFFICE -Gérant de société déclaré en faillite.

shut down pursuant to the regulations on unhygienic facilities.

where he was being held and that the authorities failed to carry out an effective investigation into his allegation.

He was arrested on 16   July 2013 and placed in a temporary detention facility in Moscow.

It is also axiomatic that outdoor exercise facilities should be reasonably spacious ... 49.

Russia, nos. 78638/11 and 3 others, §§ 77-93, 19 January 2021,   Art. 8 (1) - permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities - detention in different

arrangements for long-stay and short visits in penal facilities.

la procédure de faillite a commencé.

levels, returned to the Oncology Facility. 58.

applicant’s complaint regarding his initial detention in Brăila Police Inspectorate and Galați Prison, which ceased on 26 March 2015 by his transfer, for more than three months, to another prison facility

The Court found it inconceivable that, in a State subject to the rule of law, a detention facility could exist with no responsible authority.

(b)     The applicant’s detention in facility no. OD-1/T-2 Between 16 February 2000 and 28 May 2004 the applicant was held in detention facility no.

Conclusion : failure to comply (unanimously).

Both reports included general observations about problems in all Investigation Service facilities.

An intake of every dose was observed by the facility medical staff.

Contestant l'état des travaux, Mme [W] a fait consigner le solde du prix de vente pour un montant de 26'800 euros entre les mains d'un huissier de justice, afin de prendre livraison de leur maison.

Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the length of the proceedings was excessive and failed to meet the “reasonable time” requirement. 11 .

    While detained at the Kyiv Pre-Trial Detention Facility, the applicant filled in and signed a standard asylum application form, approved for use by the Ministry of the Interior.

The conditions of detention in that facility were characterised by the following elements: (i) severely overcrowded cells; (ii) no ventilation; (iii) poor sanitary conditions; (iv) no toilet facilities