CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

12 118 résultats pour « Wize »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1009DEC007481913

Admin. suprême

9 octobre 2018

9 octobre 2018

    Subsequently, the applicant’s wife was granted a tobacco retail concession under which she has been operating her business in Monorierdő since 13 May 2014. COMPLAINT 7.

Source officielle

Page 33 sur 606

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-156719

Admin. suprême

6 juillet 2015

6 juillet 2015

The article described the life of the family, indicating where they lived, mentioning that the applicant’s wife had died when the son had been 12 and that the applicant’s son married and his wife came

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10896

Admin. suprême

1 mars 2016

1 mars 2016

It was for the applicant’s estranged wife, who opposed the child’s return, to substantiate any potential allegation of specific risks under that provision.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-192029

Admin. suprême

26 février 2019

26 février 2019

Wise and Mr A. Carbonneau, lawyers practising respectively in Tbilisi and Paris.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-228696

Admin. suprême

5 octobre 2023

5 octobre 2023

On the eve of 13 March 2020, the applicant was having dinner at a restaurant with his wife and consumed alcohol to levels later tested at 1.68‰.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0329DEC001992216

Admin. suprême

29 mars 2022

29 mars 2022

In a constitutional complaint the applicants alleged that the wife of the Supreme Court judge, who had acted as a judge rapporteur in the proceedings, had been employed at the defendant company.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-149056

Admin. suprême

24 novembre 2014

24 novembre 2014

In the subsequent investigation, initiated by the Ankara Public Prosecutor’s Office, statements were taken from the applicants and Mr   Başbilen’s wife.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:1124JUD000912080

Admin. suprême

24 novembre 1986

24 novembre 1986

He admitted slapping his wife in the face on 14 August.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0628JUD001449909

Admin. suprême

28 juin 2012

28 juin 2012

Men were permitted to take as many as four wives. A husband may divorce a wife without justifying the action in court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0116JUD006046900

Admin. suprême

16 janvier 2007

16 janvier 2007

    His wife died on 5 May 1996.

Source officielle
CC

cr

61372684cd58014677426333

Cassation

17 octobre 2007

17 octobre 2007

exercé le 12/06/2006 le droit de communication de l'administration fiscale prévu aux articles L. 81 et L. 85 ainsi que de l'article L. 102 B du livre des procédures fiscales auprès de la société Fab & Wine

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0410DEC001447403

Admin. suprême

10 avril 2006

10 avril 2006

The applicant’s wife was called to the witness stand but declined to give testimony against her husband.

Source officielle
CA

Pôle 6 - Chambre 4

6788a0a3a1dbfbd5d79cd642

Appel

15 janvier 2025

15 janvier 2025

EXPOSE DU LITIGE Marie Brizard Wine & Spirits est un groupe spécialisé dans la distribution de vins et de spiritueux.

Source officielle
CA

Pôle 6 - Chambre 4

6788a0a5a1dbfbd5d79cd664

Appel

15 janvier 2025

15 janvier 2025

EXPOSE DU LITIGE [Localité 6] Brizard Wine & Spirits est un groupe spécialisé dans la distribution de vins et de spiritueux.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1129DEC004224698

Admin. suprême

29 novembre 2001

29 novembre 2001

The applicant and his wife failed to make payments. On 24 February 1995, the Bank brought proceedings against the applicant and his wife seeking possession of the farm.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1220JUD004119502

Admin. suprême

20 décembre 2007

20 décembre 2007

On 1 March 1997 the trial judge's wife was employed with the defendant as an assistant to the manager of its branch office. 8.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-119137

Admin. suprême

5 avril 2013

5 avril 2013

A prerequisite for the permit was that the wife continued to live in Norway. 20.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1015JUD005070007

Admin. suprême

15 octobre 2009

15 octobre 2009

[during] an in situ inspection of the [defendant's] flat traces of her [the defendant's wife] bloodstains were found ...” 17.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0902DEC006156400

Admin. suprême

2 septembre 2004

2 septembre 2004

According to the preparatory notes to the Act (Government Bill 1990/91:10, p. 35) removal of remains or ashes may be permitted if a mistake took place at the time of the interment, if husband and wife

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-200408

Admin. suprême

20 décembre 2019

20 décembre 2019

documents submitted by him proved that he was physically unable to conceive, and (ii)   the first-instance court had failed to take positive action either to ensure that the applicant’s former wife

Source officielle