The administrative courts denied compensation to the applicants, finding that there was no fault on the part of the administrations which had issued the unlawful acts, as they had made an “excusable error

: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made

: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made

: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made

    In 1997 the local authority issued a certificate confirming that the applicant had been allotted a plot of land and that, since 1991, he had made a number of improvements - drilled a well

  38356/18), as regards the conditions of his detention (compare Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, §§   155-56, ECHR 2014).

    The Government made preliminary objections in relation to some of the applications (see Appendix A). 1.     The Government’s objection of incompatibility ratione temporis 19.

Ms Maria Luz Casado Perez, Ms Daria Amelia Casado Perez, Ms   Maria Teresa Sales Aige and Mr Javier Bruna Reverter, were born in 1954, 1952, 1950, 1950, 1951 and 1957 respectively and live in Valencia

The Court has accepted that the next-of-kin or heir may in principle pursue the application, provided that he or she has sufficient interest in the case (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin

Decisions made by the IBKF must be implemented in the national legal order and followed by the respective signatory states. 3 .

    The Court reiterates that it is not its function to deal with errors of fact or law allegedly made by a national court, unless and in so far as they may have infringed rights and freedoms

The Court also notes that the applicant cannot be reproached for having made use of a remedy at a time when the Court had not yet ruled on its compatibility with Article 35 of the Convention (see, for

    The Court observes that the Government did not claim that those arguments made by the applicant had been addressed by the domestic courts or that they had not been decisive for the outcome

: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made

The Court has accepted that the next-of-kin or heir may in principle pursue the application, provided that he or she has sufficient interest in the case (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin

principle of legal certainty dictates that where a civil dispute is examined on the merits by the courts, it should be decided once and for all, and a departure from that principle is justified only when made

The Court considers that the analysis and finding it made in Mursaliyev and Others also apply to the present case and sees no reason to deviate from that finding. 12 .

According to his report, the applicant had no injuries and made no complaints. 16 .

In particular, they did not make a proper assessment of the need for the applicant’s continued detention in view of his state of health. 75.