22.9.2005 [Section III] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for private life Interception of telephone communications by the special services: admissible   Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 Fair hearing

Regional Department of the State Security Service of Ukraine (“the SBU”) with a written statement that the applicant and the head of the local bailiffs’ service, G., were soliciting a bribe from him for helping

Pleadings are exchanged and formally submitted to the court during a hearing.

Under a heading: “ Who? ” the column was illustrated with a photograph of K.U., taken at the public defence of his doctoral thesis.

    The applicant claimed that there had been a breach of her right to a fair hearing in view of the authorisation and implementation of the model used against her.

    According to the transcript of the Šalčininkai District Court hearing of 8 July 2005, the applicant, an interpreter and the lawyer for M.B. took part in that hearing.

No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

to an “oral hearing” unless there are exceptional circumstances that justify dispensing with such a hearing (see Göç v.

France - 53406/10 Judgment 10.1.2013 [Section V] Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 Criminal charge Fair hearing Assize court judgment containing statement of reasons for jury’s guilty verdict:

He relied on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, the relevant parts of which provide: “In the determination of ... any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing ... by [a] ..

No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

    A hearing took place in public in the Human Rights Building, Strasbourg, on 27 January 2016 (Rule 59 § 3).

Article 6 § 1 of the Convention provides, in so far as relevant: “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing

    The applicants alleged, in particular, that the admission of pre-trial witness statements in evidence against them had been in breach of their right to a fair hearing. 4.

No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

    The applicant complained that the proceedings had been unfair, in that the domestic court had not held an oral hearing and had imposed an administrative fine without granting him a hearing

for drug-trafficking had been in breach of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, which reads as follows: “In the determination of ... any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing

[a fair hearing before a] ... tribunal ... [in the determination] ... of his [or her] rights and obligations ...”

No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)