The Constitutional Court had assessed the legal provisions on which the extraordinary measures had been based, however, it had not assessed whether the impugned measures had in fact been justified in the

The first applicant had been discovered in circumstances which themselves had given rise to a credible suspicion that he had been a victim of trafficking.

As Mr Fitzgerald had appeared to aim a gun at one of the police officers and had not responded when ordered to drop it, a police officer had fired one shot, which had killed Mr   Fitzgerald.

partisans had been captured, one of whom had been tortured and executed.

to kill his children in front of the applicant, on the other he had threatened to take them to Turkey, but he had also threatened to commit suicide) and had been issued on a daily basis over a period

Law – Article 8: The applicants, who had lived for many years in the same locality, had had sufficiently close and continuing links with the caravans, huts and bungalows located on the land for these to

The domestic courts had established that although during the first eight years of the child’s life his parents had not maintained contact with him, they had nevertheless supported him financially and had

    The High Court also noted that Mr B had testified that he had not noticed anything conspicuous about Ms A; she had been cheerful and friendly and her clothes had not been in a disorder.

She had had some water left in a 500ml bottle which she had had no choice but to drink slowly so that it did not run out.

D.J. had been left lying face down, and he had also been bleeding heavily from a cut on his forehead (which had occurred when he had hit the car).

He had been fidgety and had changed his play activities frequently, had had heightened emotions, and had become very angry, very sad and very happy.

Furthermore, the message had not concerned judicial proceedings that had been “ongoing” at the time it had been posted.

Lastly, the applicant had had recourse to civil proceedings, which, despite their length, had been effective and had permitted responsibility to be established regarding A.J.’s death.

But as the authorities had not conducted an effective inquiry into the alleged death and had constantly denied that the applicant’s son had been arrested, the applicant had not had any basis on which he

The applicant had not risked detention or a large fine, but had instead been dismissed, which had meant that for five years he had had no right to be re-employed as a public official.

believed that their lives had been in danger both when they had opened fire and as they had continued to fire; that the force used throughout had been reasonable in the circumstances; and that once the

The Constitutional Court noted that, even though the applicant had denied having any corruption agreement with Zdravko Mamić, he had not denied that, while the proceedings against latter had been pending

authorities had acted.

had not had sufficient control over its warders.