Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-122869
26 juin 2013
26 juin 2013
The court explicitly noted that in finding the applicant guilty, it relied on the testimony of witness C.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:1130DEC002201593
30 novembre 1994
30 novembre 1994
By judgment of 2 October 1992 the applicant was found guilty of the charges brought against him and sentenced to 11 years' imprisonment.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-202313
4 mars 2020
4 mars 2020
In substantiating the applicant’s guilt, the Criminal Court of Appeal also relied on Z.A.’s statements.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0514DEC004683618
14 mai 2024
14 mai 2024
The Court further notes that the Court of Appeal explicitly held that the statement of N. did not constitute decisive evidence for its guilty verdict.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-203819
16 juin 2020
16 juin 2020
On 30 January 2013 the District Court found the applicant guilty as charged and sentenced him to five years and six months’ imprisonment with confiscation of thirty percent of his property.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0117JUD005958812
17 janvier 2017
17 janvier 2017
However, the instant case is one which, to my mind, involves a clear declaration of guilt by legislative act. 3.
Source officiellesoc
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2012:SO02068
26 septembre 2012
26 septembre 2012
LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE SOCIALE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Attendu, selon l'arrêt attaqué, que Mme X... a été engagée par la société Codir, filiale de la Guilde des lunetiers, à compter du
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0710DEC001244586
10 juillet 1989
10 juillet 1989
The applicant mainly pleaded not guilty or did not comment. The Court also heard altogether 26 witnesses.
Source officiellecomm
6079d3729ba5988459c59580
17 février 1981
17 février 1981
NOVEMBRE 1971, INTITULE << CONTRAT DE DEPOT-CONSIGNATION >> IL AVAIT ETE CONVENU QUE LES MARCHANDISES LIVREES, EN VUE DE LA CONSTITUTION D'UN STOCK A SA DISPOSITION, A LA SOCIETE BARBARIN PAR LA SOCIETE GUILLE
Source officiellesoc
61372362cd58014677409164
7 octobre 1999
7 octobre 1999
peu important qu'elle l'ait été par un autre praticien, et alors que la visite préanesthésique est incluse dans le forfait d'anesthésie, de sorte qu'aucune autre "CS" ne pouvait être notée par Mme Guille
Source officiellesoc
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2023:SO10157
1 mars 2023
1 mars 2023
la société Guilers distribution et la condamne à payer à M.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0406DEC004347098
6 avril 2000
6 avril 2000
The second accused was found guilty of offences almost identical to WF and he was sentenced to 30 months’ imprisonment.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:0714DEC001117084
14 juillet 1987
14 juillet 1987
The applicant pleaded not guilty and asked for the taking of expert evidence to the effect that his wine had not been imitated or adulterated.
Source officielleCASELAW;STATEMENTOFFACTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3727768-4251574
7 novembre 2011
7 novembre 2011
He pleaded guilty to conspiracy to cheat the public revenue in relation to excise duty and tax payable on imported cigarettes.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-226536
20 octobre 2011
20 octobre 2011
He pleaded guilty to conspiracy to cheat the public revenue in relation to excise duty and tax payable on imported cigarettes.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1003JUD006198512
3 octobre 2019
3 octobre 2019
This does not include the finding of criminal guilt, which is not a constitutive element of a criminal offence according to German legal methodology (see paragraph 30 above).
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1216JUD004884399
16 décembre 2003
16 décembre 2003
Apart from that, the function of the President and the other officer members is to decide, on the evidence, whether the accused is guilty or not guilty; and if guilty, then to decide, together with the
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-52207
26 février 2001
26 février 2001
1999, in accordance with former Article 32, paragraph 2, of the Convention, that the Government of the respondent State was to pay the applicant as just satisfaction, within three months, 2 700 Dutch guilders
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-51168
9 février 1996
9 février 1996
in respect of non-pecuniary damage and 3 386 Dutch guilders in respect of costs and expenses, namely a total sum of 36 930 Dutch guilders; Whereas the Committee of Ministers invited the
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-1473
9 juin 2009
9 juin 2009
19847/07 Judgment 9.6.2009 [Section IV] Article 6 Article 6-3-c Defence in person Refusal to grant accused leave to appear at appellate hearing concerning questions of fact relevant to the issue of guilt
Source officiellePage 33 sur 692