Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0314DEC002327604
14 mars 2006
14 mars 2006
He maintained that he fell within the jurisdiction of all the respondent States because they were the occupying powers in Iraq, because he was under their direct authority and control or because they were
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0313DEC007223101
13 mars 2003
13 mars 2003
The hearing scheduled for 10 February 1998 was adjourned because the defendants did not appear. However, the court heard the applicant.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-146046
7 juillet 2014
7 juillet 2014
In the letter of 26 January 2011 addressed to the applicant’s mother it was found that there had been no possibility of placing the applicant in the therapeutic ward because of his legal status
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0106DEC001872005
6 janvier 2011
6 janvier 2011
The applicant also complained under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 that the decision on reverting her money to the State had not had a legal basis because Article 188 of the Criminal Code did
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2727843-2985700
12 mai 2009
12 mai 2009
(prohibition of discrimination) , namely that the authorities had discriminated against him by denying him the right to take over the tenancy of the flat, was declared inadmissible , in particular because
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-180438
4 janvier 2018
4 janvier 2018
The applicant thought that this amount was excessive because it amounted to almost half of the garden community’s budget.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1211DEC000374202
11 décembre 2003
11 décembre 2003
In this connection they submitted that the applicant did enjoy access to a court because she had instituted civil proceedings for damages before the Virovitica Municipal Court.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1211DEC000374502
11 décembre 2003
11 décembre 2003
In this connection they submitted that the applicant did enjoy access to a court because he had instituted civil proceedings for damages before the Osijek Municipal Court.
Source officielleETRANGERS
68ef2a741643bddf8ff84d51
9 octobre 2025
9 octobre 2025
centre de rétention de : [V] [S] X se disant [Y] [J] né le 06 Août 1974 à [Localité 1] (MAROC) de nationalité Marocaine Vu l'appel formé le 09 octobre 2025 à 11 h 02 par courriel, par Me Aurore BECHARD
Source officielleETRANGERS
6698b085e6ed70c67f644abc
17 juillet 2024
17 juillet 2024
maintien au centre de rétention de : [K] [R] né le 04 Septembre 2004 à [Localité 5] (ALGÉRIE) de nationalité Algérienne Vu l'appel formé le 15 juillet 2024 à 11 h 46 par courriel, par Me Aurore BECHARD
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1207DEC003398196
7 décembre 1999
7 décembre 1999
The applicant’s family lived in the house until 1957, when they moved to the Turkish quarter of Larnaca because of the inter-communal troubles.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0325JUD006224200
25 mars 2003
25 mars 2003
On that date it was adjourned again because the applicant had in the meantime replaced his lawyer.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0511DEC003966198
11 mai 1999
11 mai 1999
It is important because it is serious. And it is serious from the point of view of the defendant who is on trial.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0205DEC004290898
5 février 2004
5 février 2004
The construction of this building never started, apparently because of financial difficulties experienced by the municipality and because its construction would interfere with the restitution of certain
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0303JUD005702800
3 mars 2011
3 mars 2011
Because of this particularity, it was inadmissible to directly compare the lawyers' pension scheme to the general social insurance scheme. 37.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-139579
20 novembre 2013
20 novembre 2013
applicant complains under Article 3 of the Convention that there are substantial grounds for believing that he will be subjected to treatment prohibited by that provision if he were expelled to Iran because
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-156190
17 juin 2015
17 juin 2015
He claims that he contacted the illness in prison, because of the poor living and working conditions.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-6703
14 mars 2000
14 mars 2000
Furthermore, the applicant’s action was rejected because no one appeared at the scheduled hearing.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-189213
25 novembre 2018
25 novembre 2018
Thus, the final judgment of 22 May 2014 had breached the principle of legal certainty because it had ignored the final judgment of 3 June 2010, had breached the principle of equality of arms because it
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-222856
6 janvier 2023
6 janvier 2023
that the criminal organisation he was suspected to lead functioned on the basis of strict hierarchy and anyone who had disobeyed it had been strictly punished; and (3) he might commit further crimes because
Source officiellePage 33 sur 1499