Further, at the request of the GPO, the Basmanniy District Court of Moscow decided to detain the applicant pending the investigation.

    Proceedings before the Asti District Court 24 .     The Asti District Court’s judgment was delivered on 30   January 2012. Its findings may be summarised as follows. 25 .

The Court of Appeal found no reason to deviate from the assessment of the evidence as conducted by the District Court and affirmed the conclusions reached by the latter.

    By a judgment of 23 July 2009 the Kalininskiy District Court (St   Petersburg) rejected his claim in full as unsubstantiated.

    La requête introduite par M me Alexandra Krejzová 17.

    On 16 July 2004 the Zamoskvoretskiy District Court of Moscow authorised the applicant’s detention until 19 July 2004.

“the ROVD” and “the district prosecutor’s office”). 15.

    On 11 January 2006 the Court of Appeal dismissed the applicant’s appeal and remitted the case to the Nasimi District Court.

    On 12 July 2007 the applicants brought an action against the Sabail District Police Office claiming that they had been ill-treated by the police during the dispersal of the demonstration

parlementaire allemande ........ 19 2.

  In October 1995 the district court gave an interim decision allowing the applicant to see his son every other weekend.

    On 24 October 2011 the Bucharest District Court severed the civil claims from the criminal proceedings. 9.

  Hannes   Karrer and Ms   Alexandra   Bianca Karrer (“the applicants”), on 16   March   2010. 2.

    Le 11 septembre 2004, le patriarche orthodoxe d’Alexandrie et de toute l’Afrique Petros VII et seize autres personnes (dont son frère Georgios Papapetrou, le métropolite Chrysostome de Carthagène

    Le 20 février 2018, une chambre de la première section composée de Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos, président, Kristina Pardalos, Ganna Yudkivska, Robert Spano, Aleš Pejchal, Dmitry Dedov et Jovan

The applicant challenged that decision before the Bucharest District Court.

In addition, the President was on the Convening Officer's staff in London District and the remaining members served in units stationed within London District which the Convening Officer commanded.

    On 14 April 2005 the District Court again extended the applicant’s pre-trial detention until 21 July 2005.

    On 14 November 2005 the District Court invalidated R.’s will and Yar.’s title to the flat.