and Mr   Kovtun, who had placed the polonium ‑ 210 in a teapot at the hotel bar; that they had done so with the knowledge that they were administering a deadly poison; and that they had made

However, they had no evidence to connect Mr Steiner to the suitcase full of drugs they claimed had been planted on them at Heathrow or to substantiate their belief that he was a Customs and Excise informer

They must therefore indicate the reasons why they have found that the question is irrelevant, that the European Union law provision in question has already been interpreted by the CJEU, or that the correct

it held: “As to the suggestion that requiring yet a further remedy would result in domestic proceedings being made even more cumbersome, the Court would observe that (...) there are examples emerging

    The Government asked the Court to hold that there had not been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention. 20.

It decided to examine the complaint under Article   8 alone and unanimously declared it admissible, holding, by four votes to three, that there had been no violation of that provision.

They conceded that the conditions during both periods had been identical. However, they concluded that the applicant had not complied with the six-month rule in respect of the first period.

case is that the obligation to perform such service is exclusively one of law and theory.

Turkey and argues that the Russian Federation has failed to satisfy the requirement that the remedy was “an effective one, available in theory and in practice at the relevant time, that is to say, that

They had argued that it had to be possible to amend or quash a decision on amnesty in exceptional cases where it was contrary to the Constitution and its underlying principles.

  He noted that the Council had acknowledged that there was a shortfall of about 22 pitches in the area.

They had been justified in thinking that there was a real risk that one of them or a civilian would be injured or killed by the fugitive, and in believing in good faith that it was necessary to retaliate

Notwithstanding, they asserted that in some instances that they had cited (see relevant domestic law and practice above) the Constitutional Court had directed complainants to pursue an action for protection

They submitted that that remedy, even if it seemed weaker than the cassation appeal brought directly by the applicant was, nevertheless, available and could be successful.

He recalled that he had given two persons a lift on the way to AM, and that when there a police car had passed and that they had feared getting caught.

Sur le rapport de Mme Feydeau-Thieffry, conseiller référendaire, les observations de la SCP Fabiani, Luc-Thaler et Pinatel, avocat de M. [S], et l'avis de M.

The reason for this is that the RZS, as the applicant’s employer, was not even a party to those proceedings, that they concerned Mr A’s honour and reputation, not the applicant’s privacy, and that the

When they were informed that there was a burned body at the hotel, a team of security forces arrived at the hotel in the morning of 4 October 1992.

Hence, it cannot be invoked to conclude that the existence of this particular domestic remedy had been sufficiently certain not only in theory but also in practice at the time the applicant’s proceedings