font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 23 September 2024   SECOND SECTION Applications nos. 39963/23 and 39984/23 Jessikka Henni Maria

de décision : B N° RG 25/03927 - N° Portalis 35L7-V-B7J-CLVK2 Décision déférée : ordonnance rendue le 19 juillet 2025, à 11h40, par le magistrat du siège du tribunal judiciaire de Paris Nous, Maria-Pia

de décision : B N° RG 25/03925 - N° Portalis 35L7-V-B7J-CLVKY Décision déférée : ordonnance rendue le 17 juillet 2025, à 18h43, par le magistrat du siège du tribunal judiciaire de Paris Nous, Maria-Pia

against Romania The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 25   November 2021 as a Committee composed of:   Armen Harutyunyan, President,   Jolien Schukking,   Ana Maria

That fact alone did not retroactively remove the disadvantage that she had encountered during the admission process.

On 25 March 1970 the Reggio di Calabria District Council adopted a general development plan, which came into force in 1985.

période allant du 2 décembre 2010 au 17 mars 2011 ; il invoque les mêmes moyens que sous le n° 351710 ; Vu le jugement attaqué ; Vu le mémoire en défense, enregistré le 31 août 2011, présenté par Mme Diaz

in application no. 7290/16 the applicant’s complaint regarding his initial detention in Mărgineni Prison, which ceased on 7 June 2011 by his transfer to another prison facility in respect of which he did

He reasoned that the letter of the Registry did not specify the relevant criminal case and that therefore the applicant had not shown that she needed the requested document. COMPLAINTS 1.

    Did the applicants have at their disposal an effective domestic remedy for their complaints under Article 3 as required by Article 13 of the Convention?

Yusuf POSLU, né en 1963 et résidant à Manisa.   3.     Requête n o 6304/04 , présentée par M. Lütfi TURAN, né en 1961 et résidant à Manisa.   4.

Considering that the applicants should be deemed to have benefited from the construction of the road, it did not award any compensation for part of the expropriated land.

  Has the applicants’ right to a fair trial and in particular their right to an impartial tribunal, under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, been breached in that the Supreme Administrative Court did

avait pas lieu à suivre en l'état contre quiconque de ce chef ; "aux motifs propres que sur l'abus de faiblesse susceptible d'avoir été commis à l'encontre de Maria Z..., épouse X... : l'article 223-

Hornikx Gijsbertus Wilhelmus Josephus Maria Mr 18/11/1947 Dutch 12.

    (a)     Did the applicants exhaust the remedies available in domestic law in relation to their complaints under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention?

Italy 17/07/2020 Valentina MALTESE 1970 Rome Italian Maria Rosaria DAMIZIA Rome Judgment of the Lazio Regional Administrative Court, R.G. 11949/1994, 25/02/2002 Judgment of the Consiglio di Stato , R.G

Türkiye 01/12/2021 Neslihan CANDEMİR 1982 Manisa Turkish Menşur NAVRUZ   59860/21 Şengül v. Türkiye 09/12/2021 Mehmet ŞENGÜL 1971 Manisa Turkish Ferhat KONUR   60135/21 Özgül v.

The seller was Ms E.M.T., acting on behalf of herself and her daughter Maria, a minor.