Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1127DEC005765600
27 novembre 2006
27 novembre 2006
On 16 March 1994 the sole trader obtained a VAT registration. 3.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2006701-2123413
22 mai 2007
22 mai 2007
In March 1996, charges were brought against Mr Kaszczyniec for large-scale fraud.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-180968
23 janvier 2018
23 janvier 2018
On 12 March 2002 two military police officers were questioned who denied the applicant’s ill-treatment.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-110122
6 février 2012
6 février 2012
The applicant entered the UK on 22 December 2009, using his own passport and a visit visa valid until 24 March 2010.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0327JUD007135401
27 mars 2007
27 mars 2007
On 12 March 1995 the applicant was taken into police custody on suspicion of membership of an illegal organisation. 6.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-161743
3 mars 2016
3 mars 2016
On 18 March 2013 the Nasimi District Court dismissed the request, finding that there was no need to change the preventive measure of remand in custody.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0324DEC002372803
24 mars 2009
24 mars 2009
On 11 March 2005 the Lugansk Regional Court of Appeal allowed those appeals, finding that remittal of the case for additional investigation had not been justified, as the first-instance court could clarify
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-114047
26 septembre 2012
26 septembre 2012
On 22 March 2007 the Regional Court held an appeal hearing.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1126DEC000840712
26 novembre 2019
26 novembre 2019
Turkey , no. 53567/07, 13 March 2018; Canşad and Others v. Turkey , no. 7851/05, 13 March 2018; İzzet Çelik v. Turkey , no.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0430DEC004562909
30 avril 2019
30 avril 2019
Turkey , no. 28439/03, 23 March 2010). 14.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0613JUD007065617
13 juin 2023
13 juin 2023
On 12 March 2015 the Tirana Appeal Court held a hearing, where the applicant was present.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-226247
10 juillet 2023
10 juillet 2023
On 16 September 2020, the Gostynin Court upheld the prosecutor’s decision and his findings. 26.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1654020-1735609
25 avril 2006
25 avril 2006
In view of that finding, the Court considered that it was not necessary to rule on the applicants complaints under Article 13.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0622DEC003192696
22 juin 2000
22 juin 2000
October 1992, 9 March 1993.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0930DEC003195005
30 septembre 2008
30 septembre 2008
On 21 March 2005 the Court of Cassation refused the applicant leave to appeal. 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0530DEC003137996
30 mai 2000
30 mai 2000
In a writ served on the tenant on 23 March 1991, the applicant summoned him to appear before the Turin Magistrate.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-180985
23 janvier 2018
23 janvier 2018
On 26 March 2012 the Warsaw Regional Court ordered the return of the applicant’s car.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-12800
28 mai 2020
28 mai 2020
The applicant had sexual relations with V., with whom he fathered a child born in March 2011.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0206DEC001796414
6 février 2025
6 février 2025
Georgia , no. 74644/01, §§ 30-31, 7 March 2006). 15.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-199533
25 novembre 2019
25 novembre 2019
On 30 March 2018 the Moscow City Court upheld the judgment of 10 April 2017 on appeal. Application no.
Source officiellePage 32 sur 1230