CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-180972
22 janvier 2018
It was further explained that, in a move of “obvious squandering” (“ очевидно прахосничество ”), Z.I. had created many unnecessary posts in the company.
Page 32 sur 4434
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0306DEC002106308
6 mars 2018
On 17 August 2006 the applicant made a confession statement.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0202JUD002619813
2 février 2021
The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 7.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0206JUD003661903
6 février 2007
SEK 775,000, that he had made in his tax return for 1995.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0119DEC006154009
19 janvier 2010
She therefore made a final care order, dispensed with the applicants’ consent and made a placement order.
ECLI:CEDH:001-180971
It analysed the allegations made by him and concluded that they had been untrue.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1113JUD000697015
13 novembre 2018
On 6 May 2009 one of the Chinese students, W., speaking in the presence of a lawyer and with the aid of an interpreter, made a statement of surrender to the police.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0510JUD001646309
10 mai 2011
is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
ECLI:CEDH:001-157362
26 août 2015
On 21 May 2015 the Baku Court of Appeal dismissed the applicant’s appeal against the Nasimi District Court’s decision of 14 May 2015, but decided to extend her pre-trial detention until 22 August 2015.
ECLI:CEDH:001-124247
17 juillet 2013
The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 3.
ECLI:CEDH:001-155559
26 mai 2015
such other document or evidence as he may deem adequate for the purpose of this article. (6) The Registrar may administer oaths for the purposes of this Act. (7) Where banns have been published in accordance
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0219JUD005798011
19 février 2015
It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Zhyzitskyy v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0111JUD004126505
11 janvier 2011
The applicant had reiterated that this had made impossible for her to proceed with her own extension plans.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1218DEC006955810
18 décembre 2012
Where an ex parte application has been refused in whole or in part by the High Court an application for a similar purpose may be made to the Supreme Court ex parte within four days from the date of such
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1005JUD002205908
5 octobre 2017
It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Kalēja v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0825DEC002327404
25 août 2005
As is made clear in the Report, there are grounds for suspecting that the bombers may have had assistance from members of the security forces.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0708JUD001262517
8 juillet 2021
It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Shahzad v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0225JUD001147185
25 février 1993
In no case may such searches be made during the night. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1012DEC003367096
12 octobre 2000
On 17 May 1995, an interim hospital order was made under Section 38 of the Mental Health Act 1983, and the applicant was transferred to Rampton Hospital for assessment. Whilst at Rampton, Dr.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0730JUD002711404
30 juillet 2009
Russia , nos. 30672/03, et seq., §§ 67-68, 3 May 2007).