attack had taken place.

The applicant also stated that she had intended to contact the Khovrino district authorities to find out where her children had been taken, but had been unable to do so, as she had had to stay in bed because

As seen, the Court had concluded that the applicants’ claim that the flats had been expropriated for State needs had at least been supported by a line of Supreme Court case-law.

Tribute had to be paid to the work of the courts, which had done their utmost to “establish the truth”.

It had had a legal basis and pursued the legitimate aims of maintaining order and security in prisons.

The body had then been taken to his office, where he had attempted resuscitation, to no avail. He had noted that biological death had already occurred, but had called for an ambulance anyway. 16.

to take preventive operational measures had been heightened and had required them to exercise particular vigilance.

The applicant’s statement had no nuance, it had not been made in the heat of the moment but was in writing and its wording by all appearances had been quite deliberate.

Moreover, it appeared from the facts of the case that the public prosecutor’s office had not made sufficient effort to establish what consequences the incident had had on the applicant’s health.

He had been arrested the next day after the authorities had verified that he had still been the subject of an international search and that Russia had confirmed that an extradition request would be sent

The only contentious issue was whether this had been S.N. or Mr Todorov. P.P. had stated that the one behind the wheel had been S.N.

he had had flu.

In the instant case all the domestic courts examining the case had noted that there had been forced penetration which had caused the applicant acute physical pain.

Lastly, the applicants had claimed that an application under Article   108 had been unrealistic once the expert opinion which had heavily incriminated them had been submitted.

Indeed, at the moment that D.G. had fired the fatal shot, the car had already stopped and the police officers who had been perceived to be in danger of being hit had managed to avoid an impact.

She had refused to surrender the items asked for, saying that she had sold the sewing machine. She had behaved aggressively and had sworn at the police officers. 13.

He had told her that a special operation had been carried out in the village, during which a man had entered her property, her house had been burnt down and her daughter had been pushed into a UAZ vehicle

In particular, he had complained that the professional judges had been in a minority (comprising two out of six members) and that the procedure for selecting the other four members (lay assessors) had

The Court had to be mindful of the fact that Ms   C. had used the press to draw public attention to the situation of her child, who had been born outside marriage and had not been formally recognised