The applicant had been responsible for significant delays in the proceedings.

Some delays had occurred when the case had been reassigned to different judges. However, those delays had been justified because three judges had resigned and some of them had been on sick leave.

  The applicant complied with this request as from March 1991, however, delays still occurred.

“reasonable”; (c)     a reduction to be determined on a case-to-case basis if the delay had been longer than that.

In a letter of 17 March 2003, in reply to the applicant's complaint, the President of the District Court accepted that there had been undue delays in the proceedings.

It is true that certain delays – most notably the period of delay which resulted from the Plovdiv District Court’s error as to its jurisdiction – had occurred prior to the date of entry into force of the

The applicant opposed his surrender on the grounds that the delay of well over twenty years between the commission of the alleged offences and his arrest had created a real risk that he would not receive

Slovenia - 71463/01 Judgment 28.6.2007 [Section III] Article 2 Positive obligations Civil proceedings in alleged medical negligence case rendered ineffective by lengthy delays and procedural problems:

The judgments were enforced with delays ranging from ten months to more than three years.

délibéré et au prononcé de l'arrêt, Président : Madame NIRDÉ-DORAIL, désignée par ordonnance de Monsieur le Premier Président en date du 19 décembre 2008, Conseillers : Monsieur SOUBISE, Madame DELPEY-CORBAUX

“Central District Court of Simferopol” recognised that the applicant suffered from a severe, life-threatening chronic condition and ordered that she be provided with the prescribed treatment without delay

La présidente du tribunal a désigné Mme Dely, vice-présidente, en application de l'article R. 222-1 du code de justice administrative pour statuer selon la procédure prévue par cet article.

in removal of a ureteral stent, lack of/delay in removal of kidney stones, lack of/delay in medical examination   16/03/2017 to 22/06/2018   1 year, 3 months and 7 days   lack of/delay

    The applications mainly concern a delay in the enforcement of final court decisions. 2.     The applicants are civil servants.

  However, the Court notes that the authorities were not directly responsible for any delays either.

The only delay imputable to the authorities had occurred during the examination of the applicant’s appeal on points of law by the Supreme Court and had been due to that court’s heavy workload at the time

  1 to the Convention, the applicant complained about delays in enforcement of the court awards in his favour. THE LAW 12.

However, as the applicant rightly pointed out, section 91 does not apply where delays caused by the Supreme Court are at issue.

He also sought a declaration that the delay in commencing the inquest was incompatible with Article 2.