In December 2012 the Kyiv City Department of Justice, acting on behalf of R., lodged a claim with the Pechersk District Court of Kyiv (“the   District Court”) for the return of the second

European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 26   November 2013 as a Committee composed of:   Elisabeth Steiner, President,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Linos-Alexandre

Devant la Commission, ils sont représentés par Maître Bernard Alexandre, avocat au barreau de Strasbourg.

    On 11 December 2006 Mr P., the Governor of Omsk Region, lodged a libel action against the first and second applicants with the Kuybyshevskiy District Court of Omsk (the District Court).

    On 2 December 2005 the Volgograd Tsentralniy District Court did not find grounds for quashing the decision of 14 July 2005.

    On 30 September 2010 the District Court extended the applicant’s detention until 30 November 2010.

On 17 July 2000 Sofia City Court found that the district court had erred in dismissing the applicant’s appeal.

Une fois le titre obtenu, elle le transmit au service des huissiers de justice du district de Shchelkovo. 12.

Zupančič,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Päivi Hirvelä,   Kristina Pardalos,   Angelika Nußberger,   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos,   André Potocki,   Paul Lemmens,   Aleš Pejchal

Le 5 mai 2006, le tribunal du district Iglinskiy de la République du Bachkortostan donna gain de cause au requérant et ordonna de lever la saisie.

Arrêtés le 26 avril 2005, ils furent placés en détention provisoire deux jours plus tard par le tribunal de district de Prague 2 ( obvodní soud ). 15 .

district d’Issani-Samgori).

    On 30 June 2005 the District Court held a preliminary hearing.

    On 5 December 2005 the applicant lodged a complaint with the Sovetskiy District Court of Orel (“the District Court”) about inaction on the part of the local authorities and their failure

    The applicant appealed against that decision before the Leninskiy District Court of Grozny.

    On 31   January 2006 the Tverskoy District Court found the decision of 10   October 2002 unlawful and unjustified and ordered the Prosecutor’s Office of the Savelovskiy District

    On 10 August 2004 the Moscow City Court quashed the District Court’s judgment and granted the defamation claims by all three plaintiffs, finding as follows: “... the conclusion of the [district

Subsequently, the applicants found out that Mr   Isa had not been a district police officer but a high-ranking officer of a Chechen law-enforcement agency. 20.

    On 15 and 16 April 2014 (see Appendix) the Maloyaroslavets District Court (“the District Court”) examined the applicants’ administrative files, found them guilty of administrative offences